A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs including uses for food and research Discu

The issue of whether animals have their rights has been a heatedly discussed topic in the recent years, and this has turned into a dilemma facing many. Some people believe that human can’t abuse animals to meet their needs while others do not agree. Personally speaking, I would assert that humans should use animals to get their benefits.
On the one hand, a group of people believe humans do not have rights to abuse animals, because animals also have feelings. Therefore, some people think it is unfair to animals. It has been reported that some pigs had cried before they were killed. In an old story, moreover, a trainer’s monkeys were very naughty, and then the trainer killed the chicken and used the chicken blood to warn their monkeys. These two cases mean that animals have the same feeling as humans. However, this does not necessarily mean that animals should have the same rights as humans.
On the other hand, humans need the assistance of animals in many kinds of ways. To begin with, humans need animals for foods. For example, in some underdeveloped countries, they must use buffaloes or horses to cultivate their farming areas. In the pasture, the ranchers breed chickens and cows to get eggs and milk, and also get the wool from the sheep. Secondly, humans have used some animals to test new medicine. Before the medicine is applied to humans, people will test it in mice or monkeys. Even though it is inhuman, it could save thousands of humans.
In conclusion, both of the two views have their pros and cons, but still, I maintain that animals should be used by humans, as its beneficial effects outweigh the rest. Some fear that this practice will violate animal rights whereas others take it for granted. As for me, it is completely reasonable to employ animals since our survival is dependent on animals.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, then, therefore, whereas, while, as for, for example, in conclusion, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1519.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80696202532 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.30628907898 2.80592935109 82% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.54746835443 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2511499696 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.9473684211 106.682146367 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6315789474 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42105263158 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.431110477583 0.244688304435 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.132791836225 0.084324248473 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826330276804 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.274249940397 0.151304729494 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0368540141631 0.056905535591 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.5 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 50.2224549098 127% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 11.3001002004 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.32 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.