A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge.
In recent years, plenty of concerns about humans’ actions towards animals have been interested in many parts of the world. While there is a school of thought that animals should be given the rights as humans and the exploitation of them should be banned, I have also heard another option that humans can use animals for needs such as the sources of food or studies.
On the one hand, the belief associated with humanitarian and ethical concerns is that humans’ actions are leading to painfulness and violence for animals. As a result of demands of food and experiments, people should be struggling for animals’ rights. It is argued humans will be able to find other supplements for not only our food but also tests instead of using animals. Whereas humans can use many kinds of agricultural products to eat, for example, beans can be substituted for animal protein, eating animals’ physical bodies would not be necessary, which is compared with murder in many religious beliefs like Buddhism. When it comes to experimenting with animals, it is also debated why humans can bring harmfulness or vulnerability to animals because of medicine and vaccines used for ourselves. According to surveys of many presses, animals are victims suffering from being kept in small cages or violence due to scientific research.
On the other hand, it is the opposite that animals should be employed to meet humans’ demands of both food and studies. Without any doubt, almost all humans have been familiar with food sources made from animals, despite the ideas of the minority of vegetarians over the world. Animals’ bodies contain loads of rich vitamins, as well as nutrients that vegetables cannot actually replace. In addition, unless it is found out a safer and more effective method to practice experiments such as on the production of brand-new medicine, and testing effectiveness of vaccines, animals, for instance, mice and flies, would still be the best choice by scientists. Those things would serve for advancements of human beings, which will lead to better life later.
In conclusion, both using animals for food and research and the rights for animals have still been debated that each would exist right to some extent.
- Plastic bags plastic bottles and plastic packaging are bad for the environment What damage does plastic do to the environment What can be done by governments and individuals to solve this problem 67
- More and more students at university today are not choosing to study science Why is this happening What are the effects of this Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledge 68
- More children in developed countries are becoming overweight This is a serious problem for wealthy countries Discuss some causes and effects of this problem 47
- Some people say history is one of the most important school subjects Other people think that in today s world subjects like science and technology are more important than history Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your ans 78
- Children are facing more pressures nowadays from academic social and commercial perspectives What are the causes of these pressures and what measures should be taken to reduce these pressures 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 202, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sult of demands of food and experiments, people should be struggling for animals’...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, if, so, still, well, whereas, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 41.998997996 124% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1866.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 366.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09836065574 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37391431897 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67852108463 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546448087432 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 566.1 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.7741652942 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.285714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.1428571429 20.7667163134 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.7142857143 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.411048272204 0.244688304435 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154932952182 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.107730625644 0.0667982634062 161% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277318436426 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0682961080439 0.056905535591 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.0946893788 120% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.