A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research.
These days, people started raising their voice against killing animals for food and other medical researches. Some people believe using animals for developments in research and other fields is morally acceptable while, others feel that animals should have equal rights as humans. However, I strongly argue that exploitation of animals for our needs is not fair and even they should be treated as humans.
To begin, there are several reasons for killing animals. First and foremost, animals serve as major source for medical research. Scientists and researchers use animals for testing the various drugs that they have prepared by trying them on these animals. These drugs help in curing many diseases. Secondly, majority of the people believe animals don’t feel the same pain and loss as humans, so, it is legally acceptable to kill them. Finally, people find meat, sea food tasty than other vegetable and in order to satisfy their taste buds, people kill animals.
However, all these reasons don’t stand up to scrutiny. Opponents of this argument strongly believe that even animals feel the same pain as humans when killed. To illustrate, research has been done by recording the pain that animals undergo when they are killed, and this proves that even they feel the same pain. Also, the results derived from medical research on animals may not be the same for when of humans. For example, the same medicine when used on animal may work fine but, when used on humans it may have negative impact. In addition to this, animals are also used for various researches such as cosmetic research which is useless and often non-productive. Moreover, we can get the required proteins from the green vegetables and they can help in maintaining healthy diet.
In conclusion, though animals help in making advancements in the field of medicine and research, I believe even they should be treated as human beings considering the pain that they go through, All in all, both government and people in the society should take a stand against animal killing for the benefits of humans.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 67 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 56 | view |
| 2020-01-30 | Humayan Kabir | 73 | view |
- A growing number of people feel that animals should not be exploited by people and that they should have the same rights as humans, while others argue that humans must employ animals to satisfy their various needs, including uses for food and research. 73
- The table below shows social and economic indicators for four countries in 1994 according to United Nations statistics Describe the information shown below in your own words What implications do the indicators have for the countries Indicators Canada Japa 84
- People in community now could buy cheaper consumer goods Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 72
- Nowadays many business meetings and training are happening online and not in real offices. Do you think advantages outweigh the disadvantages in this matter? 73
- We live in a world of technology these days. While the internet brings with it clear advantages, the problems in terms of control and security of information outweighs the advantages. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1740.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 343.0 315.596192385 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07288629738 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43765255 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.507288629738 0.561755894193 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.7804518396 49.4020404114 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.352941176 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1764705882 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.52941176471 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.498273815534 0.244688304435 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161372513503 0.084324248473 191% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109095370917 0.0667982634062 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.335401203407 0.151304729494 222% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106262639857 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.9 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 78.4519038076 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.