With the growing population one of the most pressing issues is that of feeding a large number of people. Some people think that GM food offers a viable solution for this problem.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Some people recommend genetically modified food (GM food) as a highly potential resource to cope with the global soaring food demand, as food security now is the most considered topic across the world. Although I believe using GM food can immediately solve the farming problem, I am more of the idea that this approach can not outweigh its drawbacks in the long-term.
Firstly, GM food might bring genetic-relating problems for the incoming generations, as thought and researched by many scientists. In order to get high productivity for crops, for example for the fruits to become bigger or vegetables to be resistible with pest, the GM food companies must apply biogenetic engineering to interfere into the order of genes. Even though there is no clear proof announced yet, many researchers have warned consumers publicly about the possibility of genetic disorder consequences in human offspring leading by consuming this type of food. In some European countries, GM foods are even prohibited by the governments as a preventing action.
Secondly, growing GM crops are accused to cause serious effects on the environment, as these plants are non-native to the cultivation area as well as they require particular fertilizers which may not be eco-friendly. When GM plants are introduced into an area, the local food web and then local biodiversity are affected. For example, the existence of local insects and birds are threatened as they are not able to eat the new plants. Additionally, the fertilizers using in GM cultivation are proven by many researchers to contain various artificial chemicals which can possibly penetrate to the underground water and damage the local residents’ health because the fertilizers only partially dissolve into the soil and use by crops.
In conclusion, GM food yields give people some hopes about facing the starving problem; however, using it actually raises far more concerns about the environment and health problems for the human being.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-07-20 | Evelyn_Han | 84 | view |
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent byBritish parents on their children’s sports between 2008 and 2014.The second chart shows the number of children who participated inthree sports in Britain over the same time period. 78
- The first chart below gives information about the money spent by British parents on their children s sports between 2008 and 2014 The second chart shows the number of children who participated in three sports in Britain over the same time period 89
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world. What are thereasons and how can people learn more about the natural world? 56
- The graph below shows the amounts of waste produced by threecompanies over a period of 15 years 78
- In the future, it seems it will be more difficult to live on the Earth. Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live, such as Mars. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: MAY_COULD_POSSIBLY[1]
Message: Use simply 'can'.
Suggestion: can
...tain various artificial chemicals which can possibly penetrate to the underground water and ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1669.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 315.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29841269841 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01347272903 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609523809524 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 517.5 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 2.10420841683 285% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 60.0382797998 49.4020404114 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.727272727 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6363636364 20.7667163134 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5454545455 7.06120827912 149% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204472807207 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0798912681914 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477309039322 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131221686363 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0470273554784 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.06 50.2224549098 86% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.