Handwriting today is less formal than it was in the past. What are the causes of this change? Is it a positive or negative development?
In the modern age, handwritten papers appear to be not as formal as they used to be in the past. The primary cause for this trend is the acessibility and applicability of technology advancement. This can be viewed as a positive evolution.
First and foremost, people’s writing tools have changed because of the invetion of computers. Online documents allow writer to have more flexibility since they can produce any material without pen or paper. This means that online writing will cost less and does not need to be preserved compared to paper documents. In addition, individuals can check their grammar or even get word suggestion from AI when typing on laptops or any electronic device. For example, numerous students use an application called Quillbot to paraphrase their essay, which is a very helpful and effective way to enhance their homework quality.
Furthermore, using a more digitalized method of writing can bring about more profound benefits than writing by hand. Firstly, typing and saving information with cloud technology can save us time and effort. In the past, people had to spend an immense amount of time to check their writings and find a way to store it. In some occasions, they may struggle fixing their written documents or finding where they have kept it. With online papers, this is a lot easier since people can edit, save and search for their document in online database within a few clicks. Secondly, online storage is more secure and can prevent personal papers from being lost or stolen.
In conclusion, handwriting trend decreases due to the invention of the cutting-edge technology. As a result, writers can be more efficient in their work since computers and online tools assist them in many ways. Thus, I consider this trend to be a relatively good improvement.
- Video records are a better way to learn about the way other people in the world live rather than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The chart below gives information about how many European citizens of various age groups frequently went to the gym from 1990 to 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 44
- The table shows the production of milk annually in four countries in 1990 2000 and 2010 The information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant You should spend about 20 minutes on this task 84
- The graph below shows radio and television audiences throughout the day in 1992 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 356, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to fix'.
Suggestion: to fix
...t. In some occasions, they may struggle fixing their written documents or finding wher...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, thus, as for, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1515.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06688963211 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72603359447 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605351170569 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.0631710062 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 89.1176470588 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.17647058824 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0984590631318 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0366702683664 0.084324248473 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0385562558321 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0723927933752 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0525699033642 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.