how should we ensure that television is a positive influence in the life of children
In the fast-moving world, TV is taken into consideration as a method of entertainment and gathering news from all over the world. Some assert that television has played a pivotal role in human life whilst others believe TV can do a great disservice to children's physical and mental health. In my perspective, I gravitate towards the second declaration. In this essay, I would like to explicate both advantages and adverse effects of television
On one hand, the argument that TV is a positive impact is compelling to some extent. On a human daily basis, the demands for entertainment, education, and information are inevitable. Watching TV assists citizens to relieve stress, particularly children. For instance, it is undeniable that TV brings the best comedy shows, reality programs for residents who are strung out and recharged their batteries after a long hard-working day. Moreover, it also has documentary series about geography, history, and even technology for educational purposes so that youngsters can learn and relax simultaneously.
Nonetheless, there are a variety of reasons why I am convinced that watching TV can cause detrimental effects on children in the long run. There are numerous reports from all over the world that criticize TV will render teenagers passive and less brainstorm than other ways of entertainment. As a result of sedentary lifestyles, the obesity rate in youth is likely increasing, especially in developed nations, and ends up in a bleak young generation's future. Moreover, it is announced that watching television can make children's brain less work than other activities as they are passively informed. Hence, television can impact directly the process of development of teenagers.
In conclusion, TV is a good way to meet people's daily demands yet it is not an optimal choice. Thus, parents ought to restrict and allocate appropriate time to stave children off those adverse effects.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-03 | heyrawrr | 71 | view |
| 2022-11-07 | lilyaa2910 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-18 | namviet | 73 | view |
| 2022-02-26 | Ngoc Trinh | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-18 | akorn99 | 78 | view |
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 73
- Many people are working longer and longer hours What are the reasons and effects 61
- The table shows the number of mobile phones sold in millions for a period of six years Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- As major cities in the world are growing today so do their problems What are problems for young people who are living in the cities as the result of continued growth How problems might be solved 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26058631922 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12297510498 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631921824104 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0080333607 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0989999104898 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030887594446 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419365463867 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575998798505 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259855414104 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, nonetheless, second, so, thus, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26058631922 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12297510498 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631921824104 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0080333607 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.666666667 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0989999104898 0.244688304435 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030887594446 0.084324248473 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419365463867 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0575998798505 0.151304729494 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259855414104 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.