While many students opt for self-study of English rather than learning it in formal classes, there is a widespread notion that this mode of learning is often challenging since it does not involve a teacher’s help. This essay will completely agree that despite attracting a large number of students, studying English on one’s own, without the external assistance, is actually difficult.
An underlying reason for a huge quantity of learners to choose a self-study mode of learning the English language can be the exorbitant fees for English classes. That is to say that teaching a language, especially English that is the most famous and ubiquitous, has become the major source of income in many language centres throughout the world, which ensures the enhancement of language proficiency for a short period of time but for high prices. Consequently, in order to avoid such payments, many students tend to study by themselves. For example, in Uzbekistan, knowing English has become prestige that most well-known centres charge extremely hefty costs per student, which leaves many students with poor or mediocre income background no options other than studying alone with no teacher.
However, the drawback of a self-study regime is manifestly inevitable. In other words, any learner, while studying a language, must be given an appraisal and feedback, which are helpful in analysing one’s mistakes and in measuring the progress. For example, according to a recent survey, more than half of the participants, who studying English on a self-study basis, continued making the same mistakes over and over again without realising them. Therefore, understanding the errors during the learning is of paramount importance, and can solely be achieved with the help of a teacher.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that a large number of students, instead of attending formal courses, select the method of self-learning English. I do believe that this preference is disadvantageous due to the absence of evaluation by the teacher, and hence, the concept of self-study may not always be handy.
- Young people are often the first to suffer when job opportunities are scarce In which ways does age affect employment opportunities How might employees deal with the issues fairly 84
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured
- The chart below shows what Anthropology graduates from one university did after finishing their undergraduate degree course The table shows the salaries of the anthropologists in work after 5 years 95
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 61
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 272, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ompletely agree that despite attracting a large number of students, studying English on one’s own...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 414, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...ent of language proficiency for a short period of time but for high prices. Consequently, in o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... In conclusion, there is no doubt that a large number of students, instead of attending formal c...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, consequently, hence, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, in other words, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32024169184 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95023420355 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561933534743 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 537.3 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0950270515 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.75 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5833333333 20.7667163134 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330345145364 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126013771212 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620193729929 0.0667982634062 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209905369498 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475880535074 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.4 13.0946893788 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.