Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species. Some people say that it is too late to do anything. Some people think that we should take effective action to improve the situation. Discuss both sides and give your opinion
There are tremendously controversial perspectives heating a debate over whether floral and fauna species suffer from the negative results of human’s activities. While some hold a strong view that there is no solution to this issue , the opposite makes a statement that positive action should be taken to revamp it. In my opinion, it is never too late to start resolving the problem.
On the one hand, the more humans develop, the more serious impacts on nature will be. People have taken the merits of wild creatures for personal demands. Take deforestation as a representative instance, in order to have more spacious space for working and living, they have been cutting a wealth of trees and plants. That is the reason why the hundred- hecta rainforest disappeared and many species of animals became homeless. Moreover, it not only destroys fauna’s house, but also takes away their food sources. Therefore, human actions lead to the danger and extinction for animals and plants.
On the other hand, I believe that the problem can be enhanced if a bunch of effective measures are taken. Top-north technological means are used to protect flora and fauna. For example, more reserves can be found by the authorities for endangered animals, like China had been doing for pandas, and utilize genetic technology to help the reproduction of the animals being on the verge of extinction. Hence, every effect is fully useful for the enviroment’s protection..
In conclusion, although people have seriously damaged nature and the species of animals and plants living around, there are still plenty of ways to prevent the harm and improve the positive things which have been done.
The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The world’s natural resources such as oil, forests and fresh water are being consumed at an ever-increasing rate. What are the dangers of the situation? What can be done to solve the problem?
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-30 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 89 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 73 | view |
| 2022-01-30 | Komaldeep Sandhu | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | Vũ Phương Uyên | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-12 | Vũ Phương Uyên | 84 | view |
- Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species Some people say that it is too late to do anything Some people think that we should take effective action to improve the situation Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- Human activities have a negative effect on plant and animal species Some people say that it is too late to do anything Some people think that we should take effective action to improve the situation Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 231, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... that there is no solution to this issue , the opposite makes a statement that pos...
^^
Line 5, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r example, more reserves can be found by the authorities for endangered animals, ...
^^
Line 5, column 468, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive dots
Suggestion: .
...y useful for the enviroment’s protection.. In conclusion, although people have ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 13.1623246493 160% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1687.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 331.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09667673716 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26537283232 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76529482954 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63746223565 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.5133595662 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.7894736842 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4210526316 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.84210526316 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.200777932322 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516405730423 0.084324248473 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0398122838787 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871874992605 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569544985428 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.