Human activities have negative effects on plants and animals species Some people think that is too late to do anything about this problem Other people believe that effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give yo

Day-by-day, plants and animals are gradually damaged by human activities. While some argue that addressing this issue now is too late, those who opine that this problem will be enhanced through many methods. From my perspective, environmental protection and improvement have never been late.
Global warming is occurring each day all over the world. This is the major issue why people think actions now which defend nature are late.
The temperature increases significantly in many areas such as India, Egypt, and so on. This causes lots of the lack of food, labour, and water in those places. Many animal species are pushed closer to the brink of extinction. Polar bears, for instance, which live in the Arctic are faced with not having settlement due to melting icebergs. In addition, global warming leads to the lack of labour as the higher temperature makes residents sick, which results in decreasing national finance. Many scientists estimate that this could worsen in the future, therefore, some people argue that doing anything to deal with this problem now is too late.
On the other hand, people could reduce the effect of this issue in a lot of ways. To begin with, the greenhouse effect will diminish if vehicles such as cars, motorbikes transform into fuel-efficient vehicles in tandem with factories that use renewable energy(wind, solar energy) instead of fossil fuels such as oil, gas. This can help the holes in the ozone layer get smaller than in the past. For example, in 2019, the COVID-10 spread out during 3 years in most countries. It made the trade stagnant and the number of transportations declined steadily. However, the scientists recorded that this helps the ozone holes get smaller and then disappear completely in some regions. Moreover, planting more trees avoids soil erosion when it rains for continuous hours and trees provide O2 for human beings as well as absorb CO2, which is toxic for both people and the environment. Thus, acting now is necessary to improve the surrounding environment and our planet.
In conclusion, people are one of the major reasons why the environment degrades quickly. Thus, humans should have necessary and quick actions to defend nature as well as improve it. Only by doing so can we make sure that people can be ensured to continue to live in a better environment.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as, to begin with, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1946.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 387.0 315.596192385 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02842377261 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.43534841618 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61133325228 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 227.0 176.041082164 129% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586563307494 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 596.7 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.1066747821 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4545454545 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5909090909 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.77272727273 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317720288012 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770350644671 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717811331728 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166904451785 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0319861434995 0.056905535591 56% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.