If some people get a chance to choose between life without work or spending
most of the time working, then they would choose not to work. Do you agree
or disagree?
Globalization and capitalism have led to the rise of jobs opportunities and
labour in modern times. Due to the excessive requirements of this job market,
some feel, if given the option to choose between working long hours at the
office and not working at all, they would choose the latter. This essay agrees
with this notion as employees suffer from burnout, and lack the ability to focus
on their health.
A popular reason for employees to choose not to work is the strain on their
psyche. They are expected to remain at work for long hours and produce
results in short periods of time, allowing them a small window in which they
can recuperate. This prevents the efficient balance of work and life, leading to
mental and emotional burnout, thus incapacitating them from functioning
effectively. For example, employees worked from home during the Covid-19
lockdowns without a fixed time to log off, leading to long hours. This caused
many to quit their high paying jobs as they were mentally overwhelmed.
Compromises on the priority of one’s health is another cause for individuals to
make such a decision. The time-consuming careers of many individuals prevent
them from focusing on their physiological and cognitive needs. Many
companies lack sufficient health coverage for its employees, who work
tirelessly for the profit of their organization. They do so without regard for
their own physical well-being, which affects them as they age.
In conclusion, the growth in the commitments required by employers in
modern times has been taxing on its employees and has led to extreme
burnout and other health issues as it is not prioritized. And so, this essay
agrees that is given a choice, people would rather not work than to work mind
numbingly long jobs.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-24 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | Nina Tsarevich | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-24 | Nina Tsarevich | 61 | view |
- Television advertising directed to children age 2 to 5 should not be allowed 73
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interactions among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Some people think that the government should use extra money to fund programs to improve the environment Others think that it is better for the government to spend money to support artistic programs Which option do you prefer Use specific reasons and exam 76
- Some people say that a child can develop on its own others say that teachers and parents have crucial role Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Nowadays there are a large number of coffee shops and fast food vendors on high streets and in town centres Why are there so many of these outlets What effect is this having on the society Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples fro 78
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16723549488 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7581691181 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8995643502 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288831905177 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981399862495 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916284974442 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816260169747 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975169295574 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, in short
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1514.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16723549488 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7581691181 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566552901024 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 438.3 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8995643502 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.142857143 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.288831905177 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0981399862495 0.084324248473 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0916284974442 0.0667982634062 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0816260169747 0.151304729494 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975169295574 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.78 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.