An increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. Why is this the case, and what solutions are possible?
In this day and age, it is true that the natural surroundings are put at risk as a result of the rising popularity of consumer merchandise. Personally, I believe that there are a number of reasons behind this phenomenon and several solutions should be adopted by governments as well as individuals to adress the given situation.
First and foremost, there are two primary reasons why the growing production of goods has a detrimental effect on the surrounding environment. One reason can be the human exploitation of various valuable minerals during the manufacturing process of consumer goods, which severely destroys the natural. Furthermore, the overconsumption of goods brings about wastes and pollution which negatively affect the citizens. For instance, the quality of water utilised daily by the residents is worsening due to illegal sewage dump from factories that produce those products. This is to demonstrate how negatively the manufacturing of merchandise affects the natural environment.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to prevent this problem from exacerbating. In the position of national board of administration, it is urgent that they establish a set of regulations to limit the exploitation of available resources. A good example for this is the country of Singapore, whose authorities have raised the pelnaty thresold, which successfully proves to make people obey the regulations. Additionally, it is immensely necessary for the citizens and large coporations to join hands with the authorities to protect the local environment from being polluted. Indeed, individuals and governments are the main sources to implement the preventive measures effectively.
In conclusion, causes of environmental damage stemming from consumption are obvious, therefore, actions need to be taken as soon as possible in the collaboration of the governments and the inhabitants to tackle this problem.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, so, therefore, well, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64482758621 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35168334018 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 176.041082164 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606896551724 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.2403221115 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3076923077 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07692307692 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.192081005 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0575663684295 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477079230969 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106890910843 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345714078428 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.