The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
The proliferation of consumer goods’ manufacturing processes poses a threat to nature. These damages are mostly the outcome of overexploitation and the release of detrimental waste; however, there are some viable solutions to mitigate this situation.
The environmental degradation resulting from the increased goods production is attributed to two main factors. First, natural resource exploitation required in the processing stages frequently leads to deforestation and habitat loss. When people conduct exactration in specific areas, fauna and flora face a great chance of being destroyed, which interferes with the food chain of some predators, such as herbivores, rendering them unable to seek food resources. Second, merchandised processes’ exhaust fumes may contain detrimental chemicals which can exacerbate the atmosphere and worsen the current climate change and air pollution. Even if the exhaust is properly treated, it also can make a certain contribution to elevated carbon release, intensifying air, land, and water degradation.
To alleviate the environmental impact of consumer goods production, the following steps should be considered. One of these is by launching campaigns so as to promote a more profound understanding and awareness of consumer’s consumption habits. Thus, they may change to opt for eco-friendly products or adopt a sustainable lifestyle such as recycling or consuming products from recycled materials. In tandem with this, the government should impose taxes on factories’ by-products which pose a potential threat to the environment. For example, in Vietnam, some companies conducting processes that entail releasing carbon dioxide or water with harmful elements are being taxed higher than environmentally friendly, green companies.
In conclusion, natural environmental damage, which is the subsequent result of the rapid growth of consumer goods production, results from excessive material extraction and harmful pollutants released to the environment. However, if shopping habits can lean towards sustainability as well as more green taxes need to be envied, the situation can be mitigated.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- Directors of large organizations receive much higher salaries than ordinary workers Some think it is necessary while others think it is unfair Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- Nowadays more and more people decide to have children later in their life What are the reasons Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Online education is becoming more and more popular Some people claim that e learning has so many benefits that it will replace face to face education Others say that traditional education is irreplaceable Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
- The best way to ensure children s growth is to make parents take parenting courses Do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport 24 hours per day and seven days a week To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 149, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... One of these is by launching campaigns so as to promote a more profound understanding a...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, second, so, thus, well, as to, for example, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1839.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95145631068 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29915553866 2.80592935109 118% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.650485436893 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2471953643 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.357142857 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0714285714 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215632089098 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0705104627237 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419629149424 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130855042195 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0244394776605 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.23 12.4159519038 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.22 8.58950901804 131% => OK
difficult_words: 127.0 78.4519038076 162% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.