An increasing number of people change their career and place of residence several times during their life time Is this positive or negative development

There is a growing trend for many individuals to relocate to several places and switch between different lines of work during their lives. I hold a belief that this is an overall negative trend because individuals may find it challenging when faced with the cost and stress of moving alongside lack of career advancement.

The main problems that arise from one’s home relocation process concern with the amount of money they have to spend on it. For starters, moving a whole set of living necessities is not light-travelling, which can cost a fortune even with the most fairly priced moving companies contracted. Thus, the math gets worse if one decides to purchase most of the needed home applications anew. The budget that would be well spent on other essentials in life evaporates into thin air by means of resettlement.

If expenses alone are yet to cause people headaches, it is often accompanied by the worries of moving out of one’s own comfort zone and entering a brand new scenery. Each move is each time people experience a period of agitation between quitting or keeping parts of their daily routines and familiarities, which is common in the changing of settlement. One might come up against instability emotionally and physically with one too many moves.

Another issue is that this tendency can deter career development. When switching between different jobs, one is less likely to accumulate extensive job-related skill sets, which are a prerequisite of becoming adept in their profession. Therefore, poor to average job performance, associated with insufficient experience, can hinder one from climbing the career ladder. Take Japanese companies as a typical example. Seniors who are proficient at solving critical issues in their companies thanks to their experience are more often than not promoted to managerial roles which cannot be achieved by a new personnel who has been job hopping.

In conclusion, I would contend that this trend would result in adverse implications for individuals regarding the hardship in compliance with money and stress matters and fewer job prospects.

Votes
Average: 8.9 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g alongside lack of career advancement. The main problems that arise from one’s ...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24778761062 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91934370654 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625368731563 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7934421823 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.6 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171170665734 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484538395319 0.084324248473 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0527513844524 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0844484534817 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0605378635263 0.056905535591 106% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 78.4519038076 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.