An increasing number of people do not know their neighbors, and there is no longer a sense of community. What do you think are the causes of this situation? What solutions can you suggest?
There is no doubt that people communicate with their neighbors fewer and fewer, which means that community could not be exited in the future. There are variety of possible reasons for this, but steps can definitely be taken to tackle the problem.
In my opinion, three main factors that can influence people get in touch with their neighbors and lead to the sense of community become weaker. Firstly, the increased pace of life and work commitments limit the time available for community engagement and knowing one’s neighbors. Modern work demands often involve long hours or taking work home, leaving little time for socializing with neighbors or participating in community activities. Secondly, the rapid advancement of technology has facilitated isolated lifestyles, reducing the necessity for face-to-face interaction with neighbors. Thirdly, the diversity and constant change of urban populations can hinder the formation of lasting community bonds. For example, in cities, the frequent moving of individuals and families means that by the time community ties begin to form, one party might relocate, disrupting the budding relationship.
I believe that there are some ways that can solve this problem. On the one hand, people need to connect their neighbors more positively at their free time, which can help them know more about each other. On the other hand, community can hold some party make more people get together, which means that it provides the opportunities to meet and communicate with their neighbors. Moreover, community also can advertise the perspective, such as close neighbors are better than distant relatives, which can make a harmonious community.
In conclusion, this problems will continue to face in our society unless personal, communities and society positive to solve it.
- In many countries more and more people buy a wide range of household goods like televisions microwave ovens and rice cooker Do you think this is a positive or negative development 61
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makecomparsons where relevant 67
- Many parents these days work in other countries taking their families with them Do you think the advantages of the development outweigh its disadvantages 67
- The diagrams below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 16, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...harmonious community. In conclusion, this problems will continue to face in our s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for example, in conclusion, in fact, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1535.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.46263345196 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79708058186 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.608540925267 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 479.7 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.0337088725 49.4020404114 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.076923077 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6153846154 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8461538462 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193146924508 0.244688304435 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732517424894 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0410057317711 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.113192849202 0.151304729494 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0413836380805 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 78.4519038076 99% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.