In modern days, advance in technology brought a chance to communicate easier to others. However, the use of new devices of communication such as smartphones, video call, and SMS will destroy a traditional way to interact, say many people. In my opinion, this statement is absolutely true and in this essay, I will support this view with examples.
The first reason is that in the century of information technology, a requirement of face to face communication is decreasing day by day. The primary reason for believing this is that the popularity of home working is increasing because every worker wants to work by using emails and internet. Consequently, communication of co-workers and teamwork is disappearing while the use of people on text messaging and skype is significantly increasing.
The secondary reason why improvements in technology are becoming more famous is that many students, workers, and tourists go to foreign nations far away from parents and friends. It is also possible to argue that people working, living and studying in another country receive helps of new technologies. If these gadgets do not help them to communicate with their precious people such as wife and children, going overseas would be hard for everyone. One particularly good example is that long distance between a couple with a smartphone is now no problem.
On the other hand, there are people who claim that in the future, real communication will continue because many services and regular activities of nowadays cannot be without the help of people.
In conclusion, as we have seen, this question is uneasy to discuss. Generally, it is possible that face to face communication will disappear in the future because of a decrease in requirements to meet others and a tendency to go abroad although some people think that real communication never will be erased cause of actions based on the communication of people.
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much as information as possible in scientific research, business and the academic world. Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely.Discuss both these views and 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 73
- There seems to be an increasing number of serious crimes being committed each year. While some think that the best way is to use the death penalty as a deterrent, many people believe that other measures will be needed.Discuss the both views. 78
- Some people say that the main environmental problem of our time is the loss of particular species of plants and animals. Others say that there are more important environmental problems. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 287, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'be'.
Suggestion: will never be
...me people think that real communication never will be erased cause of actions based on the co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, however, if, second, so, while, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05017756351 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586538461538 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 512.1 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6381317743 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.076923077 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.84615384615 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.236003995196 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0730761600272 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666587700162 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126339399491 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575884046026 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.