Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree ?
What other measures do you think might be effective ?
This is certainly true that fossil fuels have negative effects on our environment. However, some people offer that oil prices should be increased in order to prevent some ecological problem. In my opinion, this solution is not applicable due to some reasons but we can find more effective ways to tackle with this problem.
First of all, to rise oil price is hard to apply. The reason is that there are many driven factors which determine oil price such as supply and demand balance. Technically, we can not evaluate petrol price without considering these parameters. Even though it could be possible, It would directly affect some values such as food or clothes prices. Because, It is required to consume a great deal of fuels during the production of these products. Consequently, people would not sustain an affortable life due to the rising petrol prices.
Second of all, we could find many better and effective solutions to cope with this problem. Firstly, the mass transportation facilities can be improved. this can be a good solution to encourage people to use public transportation instead of private cars. Secondly, authorities sould provide more financial fundings to researches which aimed to find alternative and renewable energy production. This can be a long-term solution as well as It may help to prevent possible remifications of air pollution.
In conclusion, to rise oil prices is not an acceptable solution because of some factors such as supply and demand balance. In order to remedy this situation, other ways sould be considered. (254 words)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-07 | kingdangyeu0606 | 11 | view |
| 2017-05-14 | ahmetbadem | 56 | view |
- In some countries young people are encounter to work or travel for a year between finishing high school and starting university studies.Discuss the advantages and disadvantages for young people who decide to do this. 73
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace. Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake, regardless of whether the cours 61
- Some people think that wild animals should not be kept in zoos Others believe that there are good reasons for having zoos discuss both these views and give your opinion 76
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree ?What other measures do you think might be effective ? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 348, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... values such as food or clothes prices. Because, It is required to consume a great deal...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...nsportation facilities can be improved. this can be a good solution to encourage peo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1317.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 256.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.14453125 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83433096283 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5703125 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7575629994 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.3125 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0941108063852 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0325694719439 0.084324248473 39% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0249420287624 0.0667982634062 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0637732044983 0.151304729494 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.015162846339 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 78.4519038076 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.