Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Essay topics:

Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve the growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?

Over the last half century, there has been a dramictic increase in the number of vehicles. This resulted in numerous traffic jams especially in big cities, consequently high level of air pollution. Although, there are those who believe that increasing oil prices might help solve this problem. I strongly agree that higher prices of petrol would lead to decrease traffic on the roads but there are other such ways that can also help to reduce traffic congestion.

Before embarking on the concerned issue we must understand that why this has become the matter of heated debate. Broadly speaking, firs and foremost, people rely on their private vehicle's rather than using public transport that is also known as automobiltiy. That can be reduce by increse in the rate of petrol. A prime example - A survey of a transportation researchers has published in a statistical report that in 2016 the traffic congestion had fall rapidly due to dramatic increase in the prices of petrol.

On the flipside, many people prefer to go ome place to another from their own private cars and motorcycles ect, so they usually avoid the rise and drop related matters of petrol. The authorities can take some other steps to tackle such issues effectively. Firstly, the eco -friendly vehicles should be used. Thus, it will help to improve the air quality. For example - Netherlands is the country having fresh environment by applying the solar powered motorbike in transport.

Oweing to the problems of traffic congestion,there are other such ways to curb the issue. First of all, authorities should provide better connectivity. Secondly, there must be special concession to school goers and senior citizens. The major chunk is the cleaningness of the public transports, several people avoid to use them because of their internal unhygienic atmosphere. By implementing the stagnant steps the problem of traffic jam can reduce.

To recapitulate, there are no best measures to deal with traffic and pollution on the roads and we have to integrate different ample of approaches for the successful result.

Votes
Average: 8.4 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2019-03-16 alireza-kia 89 view
2018-09-14 Jujhar 84 view
Essays by user Jujhar :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...nsequently high level of air pollution. Although, there are those who believe that incre...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 45, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , there
...ng to the problems of traffic congestion,there are other such ways to curb the issue. ...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 65, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...re no best measures to deal with traffic and pollution on the roads and we have t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, thus, broadly speaking, for example, first of all

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1752.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.18343195266 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82769912702 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612426035503 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.0281137743 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.2105263158 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7894736842 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.10526315789 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164176057686 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0441632560046 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0463376285716 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0875193303793 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.044198424805 0.056905535591 78% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.