Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective?
These days, most people believe that the price of gasoline, which is the main source of car energy, should be increased in order to solve the current problems, such as traffic jams and pollution. However, from my perspective, this advice may be true in some part and there are other more effective ways to be introduced.
It is true that higher price of gasoline can inhibit the increasing traffic and pollution. Normally, drivers drive their private cars more often in that the cost of driving is negligible, compared with the convenience that private cars bring. If the price of gasoline is considerably high, the expense of driving is no longer minute. Accordingly, people may choose to drive less, which can reduce the traffic congestion and air pollution for fewer cars on the road mean less car exhaust in the air. However, exorbitant price of petrol may disorder the economy. Once the price is outrageous, chances are that the number of drivers will decline, which may frustrate the relevant industries, such as car production and sale.
However, other effective ways should be employed. For instance, public transportation should be applied. Considering the special lines, such as subway routes, passengers may not come across traffic congestion during rush hours. On top of that, the air pollution can be addressed significantly because the total amount of vehicle emissions may decline, with the petrol consumption by per person decreasing. Due to the stable price of gasoline, residents still have tendency to purchase private cars in case of the real need.
To conclude, by virtue of the disadvantages and advantages of gasoline price growing, public transportation should be put into use, possessing the strengths of reducing traffic jams and pollution and maintaining the stability of a nation’s economy.
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981, 1991 and 2001. 73
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists, not local people. Why? What can be done to attract local people? 67
- it is generally acknowledged that families now are not as close as they used to be. What are some possible reasons for this and what can be done to reverse the trend? 73
- Some people think that parents should teach children how to be good members of society. Others,however,believe that school is the place to learn this. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 61
- Some people think that governments should give financial support to creative artists such as painters and musicians. Others believe that creative artists should be funded by alternative sources. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, however, if, may, so, still, for instance, such as, it is true, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1536.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24232081911 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85452393771 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.549488054608 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.4515775886 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.714285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.165318459104 0.244688304435 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0648855851908 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472551801949 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111876667575 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412886536213 0.056905535591 73% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 78.4519038076 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.