Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective.
it is debatable that growing oil prices actually helps to find out solutions for traffic jam and environment">environmental pollution. While at first glance it seems very logical, in some conditions a downward might have vice-versa effect. this essay will investigate why rising ratio is not so appropriate in solving problems, rather than decreasing.
To start with the fact that an upward in ratio is not the best way. Taking into account that petrol is not cheap fuel, nowadays consumers mostly produce vechicles working with diesel and electricity. The former one is more detrimental to the environement than oil. So, decreasing the value is not the required way for defeating the problems. On the other hand, ratio for oil has no effect on traffic congestion. As was mentioned above, considering the fact that oil is expensive, there is huge demand to diesel and electricity consuming cars and engines with less customer prices. Accordingly, this kind of automobiles are more demandable and supremely achievable for low-budget customers. Therefore, increasing the value of the fuel does not reduce the crowededness in the roads.
To conclude, developing the prices for petrol is not always justifiable in solving the environmental and social problems, as it implicates other more toxic fuels to be used and developes the number of such fuel consuming vechicles. In my opinion, a cycling is the best solution to prevent traffic jam and air pollution. Netherlands has already promoted it in their country for healthy and green life-style. As well as a consuming renewable energy in all fields of life undoubtedly might be indispensable in protecting the nature and environment.
- The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002. 11
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective. 73
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate at fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 78
- the table below shows the cinema viewing figures for different types of films by country, in millions 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
it is debatable that growing oil prices ac...
^^
Line 1, column 247, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: This
...downward might have vice-versa effect. this essay will investigate why rising ratio...
^^^^
Line 1, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lving problems, rather than decreasing. To start with the fact that an upward in...
^^^^
Line 3, column 782, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t reduce the crowededness in the roads. To conclude, developing the prices for p...
^^^^
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...affic jam and air pollution. Netherlands has already promoted it in their country...
^^
Line 5, column 548, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... protecting the nature and environment.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, actually, first, if, so, therefore, well, while, kind of, as well as, in my opinion, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 268.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3171641791 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35713083855 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.615671641791 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 447.3 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4705519736 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8666666667 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.138180611911 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0425662604864 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0333351637955 0.0667982634062 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0936528537711 0.151304729494 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0204262172498 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.25 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.