The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart provides information on the ratio of Australians who were engaged in doing sports within 2010. In general it is plainly visible that overall elder Australian women were most active within this time period.
A clear look at the details reveals that females at 45+ showed the upward trend in their regular physical activity most. Almost 53 percent of women demonstrated the highest results in the activity, since men at the same age were less active. However, men's activity in sports increased to nearly 53 percent at their 20s.
Regarding the least ratio, men at 35+ showed the worst dynamic, as only almost 40 percent of them were physically energetic. As for women, their activity dropped only in their 20s. Less than a half of them were dynamic and did regular exercises.
Surprisingly, after the 65, the percentage for both groups became equal and levelled off, standing at nearly 47 percent.
To summarise, overall Australian women were more engaged in regular physical activities almost in all age groups that men all together.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-01 | vvaibhav51 | 56 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Afsik | 73 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Afsik | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Szprawstyle | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-24 | Jenil | 73 | view |
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010. 73
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective. 56
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- The bar chart compares the amount of time spent by people in the UK on three different types of phone call between 1995 and 2002. 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, as for, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 5.60731707317 196% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 881.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0632183908 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49941861386 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609195402299 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 270.0 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.2794596596 43.030603864 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.1 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4 22.9334400587 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.23603664747 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 3.70975609756 243% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245761378333 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100453408546 0.103423049105 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547353958912 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137948420309 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0571235669875 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.2329268293 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 11.4140731707 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.