Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
You should write at least 250 words.
Undoubtedly, traffic congestion and high levels of pollution are an essential problems of the current century which we face in our daily life. Therefore, some people believe that in order to solve these problems, the price of petrol should be raised. In my opinion, raising the price of petrol is not the best way to rectify these problems, but it can help to reduce them.
Firstly, the higher price of gas may lead individuals to by less vehicles which assist to reduce traffic congestion. Notwithstanding that this solution is assisting in reducing traffic congestion, the problem still exist, due to substantial proportion of people use their private cars for daily commuting, as it is more comfortable. Secondly, the emission of carbon dioxide would be increase because many people prefer to use their cars. As a result, the level of pollution will be increased.
On the other hand, there are effective solutions to overcome traffic and pollution problems. Environmentally friendly source of energy could be used instead of petrol in order to reduce the high level of pollution. For example, the government should encourage individuals to buy electricity cars by building roads to suit these cars. Another effective way to solve traffic congestion which is moving companies from residence places to specific area that are only for work. Accordingly, the traffic during the peak hour would be decreased.
In conclusion, I disagree with increasing the price of petrol. However, I think that using environmentally friendly source of energy is one of many approaches that could solve the pollution problems. The role of the government to find an effective way to solve traffic problem cannot be overlooked.
- On recent holiday you lost a valuable item. Fortunately you have travel insurance to cover the cost of anything lost.Write a letter to the manager of your insurance company.In your letter:-describe the item you lost-explain how you lost it-tell the insura 56
- It is sometimes said that people should be encouraged to get married beforethey are 30, as this is best both for individual and for society.Do you agree or disagree ? 61
- Information technology is changing many aspects of our lives and now dominates our home leisure and work activities To what extent do the benefits of information technology outweigh the disadvantages 84
- You and your family are planning to spend a weekend at a seaside hotel.Task: Write a letter to the hotel making the arrangements. 1. Let them know when you will be arriving and leaving.2. What type of rooms you would like.3. Ask them how much the weekend 84
- Today the high sales of popular consumer goods reflect the power of advertising and not the real needs of society in which they are sold.To what extend do you agree or disagree? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 79, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...gh levels of pollution are an essential problems of the current century which we face in...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 61, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun vehicles is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...price of gas may lead individuals to by less vehicles which assist to reduce traffic...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, but, first, firstly, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, for example, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90791794535 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552727272727 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 450.9 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0592520508 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0666666667 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.0 7.06120827912 170% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241259051871 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0910069219673 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552637116244 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164888458291 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0616188448086 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.