Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree
Some people believe that only governments and large companies can make a change to improve the environmental circumstance. From my perspective, I completely disagree with the agreement that is the responsibility of the environmental improvement is just only for governments and big companies. Moreover, I believe that not only individuals have to have the responsibility to improve the environment, but governments and big concerns also have to have the environmental improving responsibility.
On the one hand, it is clear that huge governments’ actions, such as policies and funds, can make a step improve in environmental circumstances. For example, if governments are tough to create a business or run a company, some environmental harmfully companies cannot be opened. Therefore, the air quality and the atmosphere quality will be healthy for people. Moreover, some large companies can provide funds to open green places, such as a green park, to create a green atmosphere in a locality. Besides, governments and major companies can collaborate to quash polluting actions. As a result, substantial governmental actions can create a well-quality environment for people.
On the other hand, people are responsible and essential to enhance the quality of the environment. For example, citizens can take place some tree planting party to plant extensive trees. If every people plant a tree a year, a huge number of trees will be planted every year. Thus, the atmosphere quality will be developed, and people’s health will be positively affected. Moreover, individuals should be responsible for observing and enforcing governmental policies. In conclusion, people are extensively responsible and influentially necessary to develop the quality of the environment.
To sum up, the relationship between governments, large companies, and individuals are relevant. Major companies and people observe and enforce the governmental policies. Moreover, governments and major companies provide funds to develop the country and create more green places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Nowadays some employers think that formal academic qualifications are more important than life experience or personal qualities when they look for new employees Why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 56
- The diagram below shows how orange juice is produced Summarise the important information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 87
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 73
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by governments rather than private companies Do you agree or disagree 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71241830065 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42263437654 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47385620915 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6176881499 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215986174298 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770379480639 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763750759845 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139717617496 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791382871584 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as a result, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 10.4138276553 163% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 41.998997996 62% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1748.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71241830065 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.42263437654 2.80592935109 122% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.47385620915 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 559.8 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6176881499 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.1111111111 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.0 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.72222222222 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215986174298 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770379480639 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0763750759845 0.0667982634062 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139717617496 0.151304729494 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0791382871584 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.54 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.09 8.58950901804 94% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.