Indiciduals can do nothing to improve the environment; only government and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Environment protection is one of the most important challenges almost every country is facing. However, whether only governments and big corporations have the resources and capabilities to preserve our environment is controversial issue. My view is that every single citizen could also make a huge difference.
Firstly, it is clear that human activities have had the greatest impact on the environment throughout history. Both environmental degradation and preservation are the long-term process, and no single government or big company can meet this challenge alone. So, whoever, created the problem should solve it; environment protection needs every one of us to continuously participate in.
Moreover, the public’s wills and behaviours have a critical influence on government policies and company strategies. For example, if everyone says “no” to plastic shopping bags and paper cups, the companies that manufacture such as products will switch to environmentally-friendly substitutes in order to survive in the market.
This is not to say that governments and large companies can not positively contribute. Indeed, governments can enact laws and introduce programmes to raise the public’s ecological footprint awareness; companies can promote green products to change the public’s consuming habits. But they also need every citizen’s appreciation and support to bring good results.
In summary, no effort is too small when we are protecting the environment. Meanwhile, local authorities and organisations must shoulder their responsibility to develop a low carbon economy at the macro level. Only by doing so can we assure that we will hand this beautiful planet to our next generation, and the next generation thereafter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the changes in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too important or too valuable to be shared freely Discuss both these views and give 73
- The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make 67
- Some people believe that allowing children to make their own choices on everyday matters such as food clothes and entertainment is likely to result in a society of individuals who only think about their own wishes Other people believe that it is important 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, while, for example, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 41.998997996 52% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1493.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.76447876448 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39435604011 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664092664093 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 459.0 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9686291134 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.642857143 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.64285714286 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217309431807 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0668107425189 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0658927370787 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106563298759 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0468365895344 0.056905535591 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.