Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and
large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or
disagree?
Recent environmental calamities such as wildfires, mass extinction of various species have raised great concern over whose responsibilities to take on these planetary tragedies. Whereas some people hold firm belief that only the authorities and large companies are able to shift the situation, I would argue that the accumulation of individuals' actions is also as of importance, which I will elaborate further.
Firstly, one of the main factors for the worsening of our habitats is the pollution caused by waste from human activities. Plastic trash, for instance, which makes up more than half of the total urban waste, causes long-term contamination to the water cycle as it needs years to fully dissolve. This man-made material pollution alone is the primary suspect of water shortage in various regions in the world. Hence, we're the direct victims of our wrongdoings. By enhancing the awareness of the surroundings, everyone can be a vanguard in reducing their carbon footprints, which in return will help to ease and reverse the current environment effects.
On the other hand, despite the legislative power harnessed by the government and big enterprises, that most of the "green" initiatives have failed due to the lack of participants and volunteers emphasizes the pivotal role of individuals in saving the ecosystems. My local community proves to be a good example as they proactively took action to clean up the polluted rivers when the authorities has no proper directive about it for a long time.
In conclusion, lawmakers and authoritative figures can not replace the role of the citizens and the people in the movement of protecting and coping with environmental problems.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-04 | Bakhtiyar1 | 11 | view |
| 2019-08-30 | Hafween | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-09 | pravanthbabu | 89 | view |
| 2019-05-21 | muraliv | 67 | view |
| 2019-05-12 | Naive Dinosaur | 67 | view |
- Task1 - 2: The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011. 78
- People have little understanding of the importance of the natural world What are the reasons for this and how can people learn more about the natural world 64
- Task 2 Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is it the case Who are more affected parents or children 78
- Some people think that schools should choose students according to their academic abilities while others think it is better to have students of different abilities studying together Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, if, so, whereas, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1436.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 269.0 315.596192385 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33828996283 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0498419064 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.14802071321 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665427509294 0.561755894193 118% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 16.0721442886 62% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 59.0712281911 49.4020404114 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.6 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.9 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0940270957612 0.244688304435 38% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0296704486859 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.030475114078 0.0667982634062 46% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0559525656889 0.151304729494 37% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0241841857584 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 50.2224549098 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.