Globalization has no longer been a alienated term for students in the modern days as the international exchange programs are gregariously funded and heavy emphasis is put on attracting talents. Some assert that learners should travel and reside in a foreign country as a part of their school curriculums for a short time in order to absorb the local language and culture. However, I personally believe that this initiative incurs more drawbacks than it seems and there is more than one alternative for this.
On the one hand, it is evident that students who fully submerge themselves in a multinational education environment develop holistically, both from the command of the language as well as the deep understanding of local norms and culture. Those learners have no other choice but to overcome the language barrier and step out of their comfort zones to experience everything to the fullest, which, in turn, equip them with a multi-angle perspective and real life lessons. On top of that, the proliferation of consulting services that guide and support oversea students with scholarships and first-day accommodation also help to make studying aboard more accessible.
On the other hand, the program are not for everyone, especially the underprivileged who are struggling to make a living, let alone studying abroad. An rough estimate of 50.000 dollars per semester in the US including expenses would ward off anyone who are not leading a lavish lifestyle. Furthermore, even if the aspiring learner managed to collect enough for the tuition fee, the cost of living would be undeniably challenging for the most unyielding and resilient ones. Beside that, with the advent of the internet and e-learning, getting to know a language and finding out about cultural aspects no longer require physical interaction. Duolingo is a prime example for disruptive technology that help to transform language learning into an enjoyable journey which is always one-click away on your mobile phone.
In conclusion, despite the prominent benefit of oversea study, students should have second thought on the foreseeable challenges as well as more cost-saving alternatives.
- Many countries have compulsory military service for men after they leave school It would be a good idea to adopt this system for men and possibly women To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 67
- The pie chart below shows the amount of money that a children's charity located in the USA spent and received in one year 61
- Task 2 Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is it the case Who are more affected parents or children 89
- Task 2 Today parents spend little free time with their children Why is it the case Who are more affected parents or children 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 34, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
Globalization has no longer been a alienated term for students in the mode...
^
Line 2, column 177, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
..., both from the command of the language as well as the deep understanding of local norms a...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 148, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'A' instead of 'An' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: A
...ke a living, let alone studying abroad. An rough estimate of 50.000 dollars per se...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, well, in conclusion, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1819.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31871345029 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01845179912 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 176.041082164 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622807017544 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 573.3 506.74238477 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 30.5790187692 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 151.583333333 106.682146367 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5 20.7667163134 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1666666667 7.06120827912 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.129283458389 0.244688304435 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042295387274 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417884054108 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0722152788035 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153390895308 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.9 13.0946893788 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.1 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.78957915832 158% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.