Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments and large companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
It is sometimes suggested that individuals cannot change situation in the atmosphere due to the number of people. I strongly agree that only big organizations might increase the level of our life. Firstly, this essay will discuss about consequences of small number of people, and secondly, it will analyze possible authority’s advantages.
The primary reason why one personality cannot alter position to develop the nature is that personages may not convey the information for other people in their environment. This is because of the biggest number of people in exactly country or state. As a result their voice will be heart only by their relatives. A prime example is Andrea Bishop, who participated a house of ministry, but before he was voted for equality of races between African and Asian people while authority didn’t heart him.
Another point to consider is that the state has the better chance to affect on the environment. The reason for this is that the regime have control the condition of the people’s life. As a consequence humans are likely to listen the administration instead of individuals. For instance, government in South Korea have full command over the public, where individuals have not a chance to choose, as a result many countries do not prefer cooperate with that country.
In conclusion, I am firmly convinced that the administration might improve our life by their preferred picks. This is due to the fact that one people cannot convey the information for other by oneself and the big organizations and authority might make a difference to the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | MinyiChu | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-12 | Đặng Ngọc Thanh Nhàn | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-31 | Guiseppe59192 | 67 | view |
| 2023-05-26 | Detonate | 11 | view |
| 2023-05-19 | hieu13092006 | 73 | view |
- In some countries, the difference in age between parents and children is greater than in the past. Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages? 56
- Individuals can do nothing to improve the environment; only governments andlarge companies can make a difference. To what extent do you agree ordisagree? 11
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now, and plans for its development. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- Some people believe that universities should only accept young students with high marks. Others believe that universities must accept students of all ages regardless of their previous grades. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
- At the present time, the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults, compared with the number of older people. Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 250, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... of people in exactly country or state. As a result their voice will be heart only...
^^
Line 5, column 70, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...that the state has the better chance to affect on the environment. The reason for this is...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 190, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...he condition of the people's life. As a consequence humans are likely to list...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1351.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.17624521073 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01564940061 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 149.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570881226054 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 435.6 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.159608308 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.923076923 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0769230769 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0873453949226 0.244688304435 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0292485114662 0.084324248473 35% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0289410094775 0.0667982634062 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0528303926882 0.151304729494 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0186674355231 0.056905535591 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.76 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.