International tourism has become a huge industry in the world. Are the problems that international travelers cause greater than the benefits they bring?
In the world today, tourism is one of the most potential industries in almost countries. It is often claimed that cross-border travel is the reason for many negatively social problems. Nevertheless, I whole-heartedly believe that the advantages international visitors bring the country they choose to visit outweigh the drawbacks.
First and foremost, tourism plays a crucial role in the development of the national economy. There will be more jobs, more multiple national entrepreneurs which can make a great contribution to diminish the alarming rate of unemployment. Another noteworthy point is the higher living condition of local people on the grounds that there is a significant rise in their income by means of travel related services. This can decrease the possibility of the inning of economic crisis in some developing countries.
Moreover, utilizing transnational tourism is an effective way to save the traditional culture. In some nations, the government does not have adequate money as well as conditions to renovate these historic buildings or areas. Therefore, if there is a sharp fall in the number of cross- border visitors, many traditional lifestyles along with authentic regions will be not presented in an impressive way to people and soon be forgotten due to the lack of foreign investment.
Last but not least, international tourism is the best way of building a bridge between diverse cultures of the world. It helps to nourish mutual understanding of people from distinct culture backgrounds. Not only does the development of tourism make it possible for everyone to gain deep knowledge about other traditions, philosophies, and languages but it also builds acceptance and respect between global cultures.
To sum up, I absolutely believe that the benefits of international tourism are greater than the hardship it brings.
- Do you agree or disagree with this statement?Face-to-face communication is better than other types of communication such as letters, e-mails or telephone callsUse specific reasons and details to support your answer 61
- Some people think that art is an important subject for students at high schools. Others think it is a waste of time. Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Some people think that cultural traditions may be destroyed when they are used as money-making attractions aimed at tourists. Others believe that it is the only way to save these traditions.Discuss both these view and give your opinion. 61
- Some people believe that to protect local culture, tourism should be banned in some areas whereas others think that change is inevitable and banning tourism will have no benefits. Discuss both sides and give your opinions. 73
- Violence among school students seems to be increasing Write a paragraph to suggest what should be done to help solve this problem 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 285, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e is a sharp fall in the number of cross border visitors, many traditional lifest...
^^
Line 3, column 383, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an impressive way" with adverb for "impressive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...authentic regions will be not presented in an impressive way to people and soon be forgotten due to ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... greater than the hardship it brings.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1570.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39518900344 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05448606122 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625429553265 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 489.6 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7301620293 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.142857143 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.06120827912 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20727124093 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0661705296988 0.084324248473 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840964917629 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128831808803 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104916070819 0.056905535591 184% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.