There is a global debate surrounding the issue of international travel in this era. Some people assert that his phenomenon contribute to benefits to visitor and destination countries simultaneously. In my personal view, international travel would not only result in positive cultural outcomes for travelers, but it would lead to economic improvement in visited lands.
On the one hand, it is widely announced by sociologist that people could be affected directly by others nations culture. Inhabitants of some so called third world countries annually travel or immigrate to modern and sophisticated countries and spontaneously take advantage of their superior life style and cultural criteria. For example, Canada is one of the prominent nations that level of crime and wrongdoings is in that is dramatically low. So, people from all over this planet go there and when they come back to their homelands they inject those positive effects to the core of their communities.
On the other hand, nowadays tourism industry is well-known for the major sources of employment. From services, accommodation to souvenir sales contribute to significant gain for the touristic countries. For instance, the dominant sources of living and income in nations such as Bahamas, Brazil, Jamaica, Argentina and so on are through the tourist to their countries. Of course, camping or visiting in the nature, tourist may bring about some hazardous results, although by employing smart management, it could be handled.
To sum up, in my point of view, international travel would readily lead to economic progress and boost to touristic nations, similarly, they can take lesson from positive points of people culture of visited countries. Although there might be some detrimental effects on countries by visitors, its privileges outweigh the downside.
- You have lost an important document recently Write to your manager regarding this and say What is the document How and when did it happen What did you do regarding this matter 79
- The first chart below shows how energy is used in an average Australian household. The second chart shows the greenhouse gas emissions which result from this energy use. 80
- Your colleague from a different town is coming next month and you are moving out of your current accommodation. Write a letter to the colleague to recommend they move into your house and say– Why are you moving to another house? – Describe your presen 78
- The table below gives information about changes in modes of travel in England between 1985 and 2000.Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Young people spend their free time in shopping malls. This has negative effects on young people and society. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, may, similarly, so, third, well, for example, for instance, of course, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47535211268 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.00084916568 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.580985915493 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6805289619 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.615384615 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133847593579 0.244688304435 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0458190207805 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0593716290862 0.0667982634062 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0855199820538 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0532494289932 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.