The internet allows us to stay connected with each other no matter where we are. On the other hand, it also isolates us and encourages people not to socialise.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with these statements?
The Internet is almost indispensable in many people’s daily life. The advocates of the internet appreciate it because wherever people are, it can connect them to each other. Meanwhile, many others realizing its bad effects claim that it discourages us to socialize. In my opinion, both of the two ideas are necessary for us to fully comprehend the pros and cons of the internet.
On the one hand, the connection among netizens around the world has become so convenient because of the internet. People can directly and personally communicate to each other via numerous softwares and social networks such as Facebook and Instagram. Besides, we can indirectly know about our overseas friends or family members by reading online newspapers in other nations. For example, nowadays, married couples are more willing to allow their spouse to study or work in foreign countries in some-year period because they are able to update daily life of and talk to each other everyday via free platform such as Skype.
On the other hand, the convenience of the internet discourages the desire of internet users to have face-to-face communication. The internet allows people to participate in society without physically disposing themselves to others, therefore it creates a false sense of attachment of an individual to social groups. According to research published last year in The Economist, this phenomenon has harmfully impacted on victims’ psychological and physical health. For example, according to Japan Times, there was a Japanese man never leaving his room in 2 years because he could connect to the outside world completely through online apps, ordering his food and buying necessities online. According to the article, not only his health was detrimental because of lack of exercising but also his mentality was unstable whenever he met someone in person because he had not done this for too long time.
In short, the internet has both negative and positive facets. While it enhances the global connection at the individual scale, it boosts the isolation of individual from offline communities.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-16 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Archana vijaya | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-04 | tranminh | 89 | view |
| 2021-03-08 | elisabetta_fedele | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-16 | ntngan14 | 89 | view |
- Car ownership has increased so rapidly over the past thirty years that many cities in the world are now one big traffic jam How true do you think this statement is What measures can governments take to discourage people from using their cars 78
- Sometimes people are rejecting a job opportunity due to their age or other circumstances. Is it a negative or a positive approach? Give your opinion and relevant examples. 61
- The chart below shows the changes that took place in three different areas of crime in New Port city center from 2003 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe that the government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both sides and express your opinion 78
- The chart below shows the different levels of post school qualifications in Australia and the proportion of men and women who held them in 1999 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 572, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...te daily life of and talk to each other everyday via free platform such as Skype On the...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in short, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14925373134 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75504114787 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 16.0721442886 6% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 335.0 20.2975951904 1650% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 49.4020404114 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 1725.0 106.682146367 1617% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 335.0 20.7667163134 1613% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 110.0 7.06120827912 1558% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 8.67935871743 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.21133166677 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.21133166677 0.084324248473 251% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667982634062 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126360527196 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576154649358 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 170.3 13.0946893788 1301% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -277.01 50.2224549098 -552% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 7.44779559118 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 135.1 11.3001002004 1196% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 14.07 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 24.54 8.58950901804 286% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 57.0 9.78957915832 582% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 136.0 10.1190380762 1344% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 136.0 10.7795591182 1262% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.