Internet helps student better than teacher in learning class especially for children.
*What extend to agree and disagree to this statement?
Internet use is a necessity to many of us including children who use the Internet for different reasons. Children of this century can get the most out of this fascinating network flawlessly. Provided that, some people may argue that Internet improves children can learn different things through using the Internet more than being with teachers in classrooms.
This opinion is based on the fact that there are numerous resources on the Internet that children can use to gain a huge amount of information. In addition, Internet has also provided an easy way of communication between students and teachers during the COVID-19 pandemic when children could continue their study from home.
Although this argument is understandable, I totally disagree with it. I personally believe that learning from teachers in class is extremely more effective for children that learning through Internet use. If a child is not present and participating in a classroom environment, he/she will not learn effectively. By effective learning I mean more than just the information provided in the children’s syllabus. Effective learning including teaching the children extremely valuable skills such as teamwork and leadership for instance. While being in a classroom, children will also develop knowledge about morals and communication ethics that they would never understand if they are only communicating electronically. Moreover, the trip to and from the school every morning can be considered physical activity that those young school students can definitely benefit from.
To conclude, it would be really unfair to devote our children from the classroom spirit that we all knew since our childhood. It will affect their personalities negatively and our societies eventually. It is a right for each and every child to have the chance to learn from a teacher in a classroom.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Hagar_Abdelfataah | 73 | view |
| 2014-05-05 | larasati | 76 | view |
- Describe the presented chart 11
- Please explain how your proposed studies at the University of Oxford are of relevance to the Muslim world 56
- Internet helps student better than teacher in learning class especially for children What extend to agree and disagree to this statement 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of water used for different purposes in six areas of the world Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comaparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 429, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to include'.
Suggestion: to include
...children’s syllabus. Effective learning including teaching the children extremely valuabl...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, moreover, really, so, while, for instance, i mean, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1577.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.41924398625 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99479360697 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.567010309278 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2056813597 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.133333333 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.73333333333 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.286186603671 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100557150931 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0670590656292 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173316925112 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0623175442612 0.056905535591 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.32 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.