Interviews form the basic selection criteria for most Large companies However, some people think that an interview is not a reliable method of choosing whom to employ and there are other better methods. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
At the recent time, commercial sectors have expanded at alarming rate over the globe. A recent few decade are witness of development in profession sector amid this development, there is one phenomenon that has associated with it. According to this phenomenon, a faction of people argue that interview has become the only way to hire them. While, other think that there are other other method also considered for selecting them as employee. I will try to throw light upon both view with description briefly. I will also try to posit my perspective about it.
To commence with, there are multifarious reasons to shore those people who are in favor of interview is only process to provide job to candidates. First and foremost, interview has hefty of benefits such as, employers can assess the candidates about their communication skill as well as they have examined profound knowledge, candidates abilities to solve problem quickly. Hence, sometimes a candidate who have acquired the better qualifications may fail to get the job because of his poor performance in the interview.
On the other side of spectrum, there are numerous reason that alternate method has been considered by HR departments. Because firstly, companies should also held written test at the center for scrutinizing their academic Knowledge. Another predominant method is group discussion. To justify, with the help of this process, candidates have a chance to shoe their talent or skill likewise leadership or innovative idea whether given by them. Employees can be analysed by their performance at this process apart from that this process also help to indicate the people trait with other employees.
Aggelomerating, all the point I elaborated an above that can be concluded that despite having more options for companies. As many people have stage fear due to this fear they could not able to give their best performance in group discussion or debate process. That is why I support those people who shore the interview process. It is more fruitful in my opinion.
- The computer is widely used in education and some people think teachers do not play an important role in the classroom. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
- The graph shows Underground Station passenger numbers in London. 84
- The chart below gives information about the number of social networking sites people used in Canada in 2014 and 2015 77
- The table chart and pie chart give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to us between 1988 and 2000. 73
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment. What cangovernments do to address these problems? What can individual people do? 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 374, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: other
...them. While, other think that there are other other method also considered for selecting th...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 364, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ess. It is more fruitful in my opinion.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, briefly, first, firstly, hence, if, likewise, may, so, well, while, apart from, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1713.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 332.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15963855422 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.2685907696 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83690011279 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584337349398 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.0761466164 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.1666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4444444444 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 3.4128256513 264% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147156600026 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0471112105913 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487158414596 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0890448465146 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0157748624066 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.