It is better for colleage students to live in schools than live at home with their parents. Do you agree or disagree?
It is true that the question of whether undergraduates should live in school campus rather than their own home has remained a source of vigorous debate. Personally, I believe that while starting a dormitory life offers numerous merits to students, staying at home with parents could also benefit them to some extent.
On the one hand, there are various triggers why I agree that university students should leave their home and move into campuses. Firstly, those students could gain invaluable hands-on experiences which derive from ongoing exposure to real world. Thanks to out-of-home life, students therefore could be highly independent, which means that they have to make decisions on their own, especially these prompt decisions because they have almost no time to ask for advice from parents such as going to hospital when they suffer from ailments. Secondly, as living in group with their peers in dormitory, those students could consequently expand their social circle, which seldom attain if they stay at home. It means that they would have more opportunities to meet up with new friends, strike up new relationships as well as become extrovert person. These above motivations thereafter explain for the benefits of independent life in university of undergraduates.
On the other hand, staying at home with parents could also stand them in good stead for these following reasons. One possible reason is that they would have a great deal of time to focus on academic tasks, assignments or thesis papers wholeheartedly because the less involvement in social and recreational activities, which they often engage in when they live independently. As a result, they could attain flying colours at the end of semester for their continuous endeavor during term time. Moreover, undergraduates could become law abiding citizens and avoid committing crime due to the fact that they would be less tempted by social evils or antisocial behaviours which easily charm them when they live without parental interventions.
In conclusion, from what has been mentioned above, I contend that regardless of where colleage students choose to live, whether their own home or on campuses, they are both received enormous advantages.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | chioma49 | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-21 | badboybmt123 | 89 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
| 2019-07-08 | lemaina201 | 84 | view |
| 2019-05-29 | MrDucPhD | 89 | view |
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they gotmarried in oneparticularcountry in1996 and2008. 56
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages? 84
- The diagram below shows the life cycle of a salmon, from egg to adult fish. 56
- The diagram shows the information in the genetic engineering process. 56
- Many offenders commit more crimes after serving the first punishment. Why is this happening, and what measures should be taken to tackle this problem? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 17, Rule ID: WHETHER[3]
Message: Wordiness: Shorten this phrase to the shortest possible suggestion.
Suggestion: whether; the question whether
It is true that the question of whether undergraduates should live in school ca...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as a result, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 40.0 24.0651302605 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1874.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 352.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32386363636 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79937248539 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596590909091 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 58.7764796174 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 144.153846154 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.0769230769 20.7667163134 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.3846153846 7.06120827912 190% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254046725879 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100239983172 0.084324248473 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068237855702 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171792189688 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0312801004091 0.056905535591 55% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.