As a part of education, students should spend a period of time living in another country to learn its language and culture. Do you agree or disagree?
Many individuals believe that setting aside a span of time to live in a certain country is beneficial for students to learn about language and indigenous culture. In my opinion, I agree with this poin of view since it benefit not only students themselves, but also their motherlands.
From personal perspective, spending time residing in another country is a sporting chance for leaners to be exposed to knowledge gained in school. By doing so, students could fathom and be inspired to learn more about the relevant subjects they are taught in classroom context. To illustrate, although English has been applied in vietnamese curriculum right from primary school, children have always found it difficult to understand well this subject. If they have a period of time to live in England, it is highly likely that it is easier for them to obtain this language and national culture effectively.
From social perspective, thanks to spending a time span, either short or long, in a certain nation, mutual understanding amongst nations could be promoted. It is true that some nations are highly concerned about the fact that their residents are less adaptable to new environment, especially in foreign countries, in default of know-how in terms of the host country's culture and language and they could spark hostility such as when they litter the street, notably chewing gum, in Singapore. If ,for example, children are sent to these countries to learn local norms and practices as well as language, they would be more adjustable if they travel to these countries once they are fully-fledged. Thereafter, International relations could be enhanced.
In conclusion, I advocate with the view that students should live in another country for a time period to reap its language and traditions.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-10-27 | RSudhir | 56 | view |
2019-02-28 | Anmolcheema | 22 | view |
2018-11-23 | tungductranjra16k73 | 56 | view |
2017-05-21 | kingnight153 | 78 | view |
2016-10-11 | Monica1 | 67 | view |
- The chart below shows the results of a survey of people who visited four types of tourist attraction in Britain in the year 1999 74
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree? What other measures do you think might be effective? 56
- In some countries, governments are encouraging industries and businesses to move to regional areas outside the big cities.Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages? 89
- The tendency for human beings to copy others can be shown in the poplarity of fashion in clothes and other consumer goods. To what extent do you agree or disagree ? 89
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 330, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...te, although English has been applied in vietnamese curriculum right from primary...
^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...stand well this subject. If they have a period of time to live in England, it is highly likely...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 494, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...t, notably chewing gum, in Singapore. If ,for example, children are sent to these ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18620689655 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83724171458 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.575862068966 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 65.132668169 49.4020404114 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.727272727 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3636363636 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276160708438 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108324691569 0.084324248473 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104249188756 0.0667982634062 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209516746905 0.151304729494 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102929772835 0.056905535591 181% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.