Having curiosity to know about the way of living in bygone days is common among many people. This is possible now with the help of visualization provided by videos and movies. Although it is considered a most appropriate medium to grab knowledge regarding history, I think there are many other methods to do this such as visiting historical monuments and reading printed media.
To commence with, there are many reasons why films and documentaries are believed to be a good way to acquire information about past. One most common agreement comes from people who say visuals are more preferred by masses . This is because these are interesting to watch. In contrary, books based on traditional information merely displays printed data. As a result, viewers need not to imagine anything while watching a movie.
Another reason is that films and videos have long lasting impact on mind than books. In other words, one can forget what one has read but it is hard to forget viewed scenes of a movie. For example, many movies were made based on real incidents happened earlier which are alive in still audience mind.
Conversely, there are two other favouable ways to explore about prior generations. Firstly, printed media is a treasure of knowledge. To elaborate it, movies are generally for 2 to 3 hours so it is no possible for films to cover all parts of past. In contrary, books can better do this job. Secondly, impression that historical sites leave on visitors no other medium can defeat it. In simple words, looking ancient buildings or objects live gives a feeling of living in the past for while or more.
To conclude, it seems to me that there are many other methods to study about history rather than only depending on movies and videos.
- Space travel has been possible for some time and some people believe that space tourism could be developed in the future Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- The length of the working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families How far do you agree with this statement 84
- Many people prefer to communicate with their online friends than to socialise with people in their local communities Do you think it s has more advantages or disadvantages 89
- The length of the working week does not reflect modern lifestyle needs It should be substantially reduced to give people more leisure time and time with their families How far do you agree with this statement 84
- It is better to learn the way people lived in the past through films and video records than written documents To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 138, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y to acquire information about past. One most common agreement comes from people ...
^^
Line 3, column 224, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...say visuals are more preferred by masses . This is because these are interesting t...
^^
Line 3, column 387, Rule ID: NEEDNT_TO_DO_AND_DONT_NEED_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'imagine'?
Suggestion: imagine
...ted data. As a result, viewers need not to imagine anything while watching a movie. An...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, first, firstly, look, regarding, second, secondly, so, still, while, for example, i think, such as, as a result, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1457.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.872909699 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55303523064 2.80592935109 91% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615384615385 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.1870995362 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.9444444444 106.682146367 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.6111111111 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.148426152222 0.244688304435 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0411992995139 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0390658536513 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0727090133592 0.151304729494 48% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0274888906252 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 13.0946893788 75% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 50.2224549098 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.3001002004 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.67 12.4159519038 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.