It is evident that the exponential development of technology has had significant influences on various means of people’s communication. While some people claim that it could result in several drawbacks, the opponents still strongly believe that there are a number of advantages would be created.
It is evident that the exponential development of technology has had significant influences on various means of people’s communication. While some people claim that it could result in several drawbacks, the opponents still strongly believe that there are a number of advantages would be created.
Firstly, the technological life has been altering the way people communicating. It is inevitable that the trend of online relationship is surging due to the appearances of numerous social networks such as Facebook, Twitter, Instargram and so on. These networks allow users to make friends from all the world and chat with them in addition to send images and data. Thereby, people are able to work from home as well as attend online courses. For instance, my aunt is an interpreter. However, all what she need to do is just stay at home, translate and then submit her translated scripts to her manager through email.
These evolutions of technology lead to both negative and positive impacts. On the one hand, it would bring about some detrimental problems. It is obvious that the communication through sending messages is likely to decline people’s speaking skill and ability of using complicated language. This is because if you have plenty of time to write a message, when you talk in real life, you have to have quick thinking in order to reply immediately. Also, some online vague relationships would increase the ability to be cheated when users have not even met theirs friends in real life. In stark contrast, people’s kinds of relationship have been given an amount of benefits because of the revolutions of technology. The most rewarding point is that it helps people save precious time and money. For example, it is absolutely possible to self - study through internet which means you will save time and money for transport. Moreover, the online courses are usually more affordable than offline classes. Another positive influence is that social network will give you chances to keep in touch with your family despite the geographical distance.
In conclusion, I would therefore argue that although there are some adverse impacts of technology on people’s relationship, they are outweighed by the beneficial effects.
- Two provided charts demonstrate the distance of route on a monthly basis and the allocation of mean of transportation used by Britain inhabitants during the period from 1990 to 2010. 89
- Due to having a more comfortable working life, some people believe that workers should only follow an occupation. While I admit that this option can bring about many beneficial advantages, I would argue that a number of adverse consequences would be gener 84
- The provided picture illustrates the entire development of a honey bee’s life. 78
- The bar chart demonstrates the number of Olympic blazons gained by several countries in Asia, Europe and Americas. 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel to or work in a foreign country. Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language. 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, so, still, then, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1898.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 360.0 315.596192385 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27222222222 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35587717469 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9499135076 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616666666667 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0107592233 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8947368421 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9473684211 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42105263158 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315189054419 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0918757076975 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.156044899802 0.0667982634062 234% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.277285386207 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.31518170246 0.056905535591 554% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.96 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.