It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behavior to children?
Controversial issue raised a question whether punishment should be applied as an essential means in educating children. To some certain extent, the idea is relatively compelling.
No parents want their children to become a criminal. In order to teach the young to be good citizens, sometimes, punishing is very essential. It is hard for children to distinguish right and wrong at an early age since some may be disobedient or rebellious. Therefore, punishing on an proper basis is a necessary means of education for parents and teachers. With punishment, juvenile can identify the proper behavior, adjust their manner and avoid repetition of the mischievous one.
However, penalizing a child should be taken with prudent to avoid hurting them, either physically or mentally. Harsh punishments, including psychologically aggressive and physically violent should be refrained. Applying such penalties on youngster violates the children protection policies as well as affects the child psychologically. Evidence supports that these punishments trigger some pain in children’s souls, causing some adverse effects.
Regardless as such, there are minor sanctions that adults can employed on youngster. Cutting down money or phone, detention or grounded are some of the non-extreme measures. While being grounded or getting detentions, parents and teachers can administer the rules, assign them housework or engage these young to learn without playing video games.
In sum, I take the view that sanction is a nature mechanism in education process, but parents and teachers are required to be more cautious before employing any punishments. To implement approximate penalties, consider using some approximate minor punishments to educate the young.
- The bar chart below shows the three main causes of land damage in four different areas in the world 78
- The chart below shows the changes in car ownership in Great Britain between 1961 and 2001 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisions where relevant 71
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The charts below show what UK graduate and postgraduate students who did not go into full time work did after leaving college in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The unlimited use of cars may cause many problems. What are those problems? In order to reduce the problems, should we discourage people to use cars? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 282, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'a' instead of 'an' if the following word doesn't start with a vowel sound, e.g. 'a sentence', 'a university'
Suggestion: a
... or rebellious. Therefore, punishing on an proper basis is a necessary means of ed...
^^
Line 4, column 141, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ney or phone, detention or grounded are some of the non-extreme measures. While being groun...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 41.998997996 67% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69348659004 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08893061504 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659003831418 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 452.7 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.8094301073 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.875 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.3125 20.7667163134 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.8125 7.06120827912 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 3.9879759519 326% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198979997436 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610679139106 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543300314983 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103139575882 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0613896963091 0.056905535591 108% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.43 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.