it is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
What sort of punishment should parents and teachers be allowed to use to teach good behaviour to children?
whether there is a need for people to impose punishment on their children to help them have a good grasp of the differences between right and wrong things sparks a controversy. I am subscribe to the opinion that punishment is necessary to help children learn this distinction, and an array of punishments that parents and teachers can use to teach goog behaviour to children.
There is an array of reasons why punishments could assist childrent to learn how to distinct right and wrong. First of all, it is evident that imposing punishments help children have a comprehensive understanding of what they do. For instance, when children are bad-mannered or impolite with the elderly, parents can punish them. Therefore, children can recognize bad behaviours and avoid repeating these actions in the future. In addition to this, punishment can make children become obey
There are several punishments of which parents and teachers can make use to educate children. To begin with, parents could force their children to do household works or ban playing video games when they have a bad-mannered behaviour. By doing this, it could assist children to deter themselves in doing wrong things. When it comes to teachers, it is advisable for teachers to impose minor punishment to children. They can punish children participate in training course.
In conclusion, it is my contention that punishment is a good way to educate childeren about right and wrong things, and some measures that parents and teachers can utilize to help children have a good behaviour
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-04-25 | trpg143 | 78 | view |
2024-01-03 | Ahmad_off | 67 | view |
2023-12-17 | minhnhat230602 | 84 | view |
2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 67 | view |
2023-09-05 | Nowshin Tabassum | 78 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, regarding, second, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 916.0 965.302439024 95% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20454545455 4.92477711251 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88499878253 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.517045454545 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 286.2 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.5814620271 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.777777778 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5555555556 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 5.23603664747 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285236785641 0.215688989381 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113132057323 0.103423049105 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0710363588577 0.0843802449381 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186333831942 0.15604864568 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516282863253 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 61.2550243902 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.3012195122 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 11.4140731707 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.35 8.06136585366 104% => OK
difficult_words: 42.0 40.7170731707 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.