It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Nowadays, many people claim that the development of technology would result in the loss of conventional culture, and technology can not get on well with tradition. From my point of view, I completely disagree with this statement because I believe that traditional culture could be more developed thanks to cutting-edge technology.
There are many reasons why I believe that the world’s traditional cultures still thrive in spite of the development of technology. In many countries, for example, technology and traditions are still compatible such as Japan or China. Citizen in these nations still remain their conventional ritual and traditional festivals despite the fact that both Japan and China are advanced in technology. Secondly, throughout history technology incorporated into traditional cultures. For instance, the invention of tractors can be concerned as the harmony of traditional ways of life with technological improvement. The tractor is a product of technological development but it is used in farming and helps farmers less hard than in the past.
From my perspective, technology can preserve traditional culture. Taking the advancement of social media as an example, traditional ways of life can be more popular and familiar to the young generation thanks to commercials on television or social networks. From that, youngsters might know the value of conventional cultures and make effort to conserve them. Besides, that other traditional cultures, such as farming can make good progress because of gadget devices. Mobile phones, for instance, give farmers acquire information, from weather prediction to market prices, which helps them to prospect and therefore support their culture.
All in all, many traditional ways of life have survived and even flourished in modern days.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- The bar charts below describe the weekly hours worked by people in four Scandinavian countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 79
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 78
- Some believe that success in life comes from hard work and determination Others think that it depends on factors such as money or personal appearance Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- Families who send their children to private schools should not be required to pay taxes that support the state education system To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 67
- Nowadays companies are trying to increase the sales of their products in various ways What are the different methods that they use Which one is the most effective 62
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, if, second, secondly, so, still, therefore, well, for example, for instance, such as, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1531.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58759124088 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08727414637 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57299270073 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 478.8 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8774169045 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.357142857 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.92857142857 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318132227783 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115032795083 0.084324248473 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701794582577 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.193382348601 0.151304729494 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.107358363318 0.056905535591 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.