It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops. Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?
Traditional civilizations will inevitably be lost as technology advances. Traditional customs and technology are incompatible.i disagree with this view because :
the coexistence of modern technology and traditional cultures has always sparked off an intense debate over the past few decades. Some people believe that tradition might soon be lost due to the technological advancement; however, to my point of view, technology could absolutely go well with traditional culture, which not only does not make conventional one to erode but also preserves and develops it over time.
Firstly, due to the fact that classic cultures have their own specific features which technology today definitely could not replace at any cost, traditional ones will hardly be removed in the long term future. It is true feelings that just only tradition can bring for those who clearly know how to enjoy their life in the fullest way. To cite an example, despite the popularity of E-books, online magazines or newspapers, there is no better feeling than the feeling of holding a real book, tasting the fresh smell of each page together with the flavor of one hot cup of coffee every morning. That is why traditional reading culture in particular and traditional cultures in general are always the priority of the majority in the world. Another amazing thing is that tradition can improve the relationships for the sake of the conventional connection between people and people. Unlike online shopping, going to the supermarkets or center malls is a typical example for bring people together, helping them choose suitable items and have some interesting conversations with friends at the same time.
In addition, it is disputable fact that technology does not fade away the traditional cultures but help them to preserve and develop by many ways. As the mass media nowadays has spread worldwide, people can easily gain a vast amount of knowledge about traditional values from the ancient times. Also, old houses or even a long last culture could be completely restored thanks to the help of modern technology. Therefore, the improvement of technology has indeed contributed a lot to the endurance of tradition, proving both of them could exist and fit really well.
To conclude, the advancement of technology undoubtedly has a profound impact on traditional cultures; however, two of them are compatible with each other. On the other hand, technology devices did their great job in helping traditional values to be preserved and developed, which is impossible for traditions to be lost.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-07 | dorae | 61 | view |
| 2023-08-16 | dorae | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-26 | thuyan1211 | 78 | view |
| 2022-02-09 | tranvuongphuongmy | 67 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | Emma1998 | 84 | view |
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The diagram below shows the manufacturing process for making sugar from sugar cane Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 78
- You should spend about 40 minutes on this task Write about the following topic Some people believe that it is good to share as much information as possible in scientific research business and the academic world Others believe that some information is too 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...customs and technology are incompatible.i disagree with this view because : th...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le.i disagree with this view because : the coexistence of modern technology and...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, really, so, therefore, well, in addition, in general, in particular, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 411.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25304136253 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.50256981431 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9112162873 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 239.0 176.041082164 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581508515815 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 692.1 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.5618507343 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.933333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.2 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.42659783922 0.244688304435 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1548787551 0.084324248473 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117506962841 0.0667982634062 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.291070383768 0.151304729494 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.118534844661 0.056905535591 208% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 50.2224549098 71% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.47 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 105.0 78.4519038076 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.78957915832 169% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.