Some people think that the media should not report details of crimes to the public. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In modern society, the mass media plays an important role in transmitting all kinds of information to every corner of the world, especially criminal activities. A part of the people believes that the specifics of crimes should not be disclosed to the community. In my opinion, I do not completely agree with this idea because of a couple of rational reasons that I will discuss below.
On the one hand, the publication of crimes causes an adverse impact on children, adolescents, and some other components. According to Jacqueline Helfgott, a professor of criminal justice at Seattle University, some studies indicate that criminals obtain their ideas for their crimes from the media and that the media does appear to affect at least a subset of people. She claims that “excessive media attention to a specific type of crime can be a risk factor for criminal behavior.” Kids and youngsters are the most affected when they are exposed to information about criminal activities. People at this age are sensitive and prone to imitation, so if they do not get timely education, their psychological development will be seriously affected. In addition, someone in a psychopathic status will appreciate criminals as idols and imitate their actions, as a result, the number of wrong-doers increases.
By contrast, public disclosure of cases creates a wonderful source of data for specific subjects. First, crimes that are generally detailed give more materials to criminologists and someone interested in criminology. Take me as an example, I am really into detective books but reading is not enough, so I need information from the real cases and the media was useful. Besides, people can easily know the details of criminal activities and find out the solution to protect themselves. For example, the media reports robberies occur on deserted roads and the victims are those who ride alone, so people should take crowded roads and go with friends or family.
In short, openly revealing criminal activities will have some consequences, it also helps people to perceive and prevent crime nevertheless.
- It is inevitable that traditional cultures will be lost as technology develops Technology and traditional cultures are incompatible To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view 56
- The maps below show a bookstore in 2000 and now Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main information and make comparisons where relevant 11
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graphs below show the enrolments of overseas students and local students in Australian universities over a ten year period Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make c 61
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct e g dinosaur dodo There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'effect'?
Suggestion: effect
...media and that the media does appear to affect at least a subset of people. She claims th...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, if, nevertheless, really, so, as for, at least, for example, in addition, in short, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1771.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 338.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23964497041 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95953978511 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 567.9 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.143886186 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.78571428571 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23121453048 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074628622244 0.084324248473 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0402130929646 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134188188527 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0182012980017 0.056905535591 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 78.4519038076 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.