It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
There is a school of thought that it is of greater importance to allocate the national budget for furthering a wholesome lifestyle in order to combat diseases than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already suffering from illness. I completely advocate this thinking for the reasons provided below.
The first compelling rationale is that a healthy lifestyle lays the foundation for the reduction of sickness. In fact, a host of common diseases nowadays directly stem from unhealthy habits. For instance, people who lead a sedentary lifestyle are more bound to raise the risk of health issues such as obesity, cardiovascular diseases, stroke, among many others. In addition, incurable illnesses and myriad forms of cancer are also attributable to this way of living. Notwithstanding the fact that these diseases, unquestionably, can be controlled by medical advancements, it is better to hinder them from arising instead of trying to cure them, which definitely places a heavy burden on both patients and their families, and on society as a whole.
Another justification is that the nation's coffers channeling into health attainment and disease prevention would be more cost-effective. In fact, the costs of healthcare infrastructures are exorbitant, which encompass a number of facilities such as constructions of hospitals and clinics, rarely sustainable medical devices and pharmaceutical products,whereas subsidizing health promotion such as sports centers, health-related propagation is obviously more modest. As the rate of citizens adopting balance diets, regular physical activities, and preventative measures is on the increase, the incidence of hospitalization would be on the wane, efficiently dispensing with financial demand for medicine.
In conclusion, I am convinced that the merits of diverting funds to medical therapies pale in comparison with healthy lifestyle enhancement. Therefore, it is in the interest of society to make more endeavors to cement a robust way of living.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Afdalah Harris | 73 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | vttphuong.d19 | 67 | view |
| 2023-06-15 | thadsha1999 | 56 | view |
| 2022-11-27 | tttttttttt | 61 | view |
| 2022-11-12 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
- It is more important to spend public money promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries 73
- Some people think that governments should ban dangerous sports while others think people should have freedom to do any sports or activity Discuss both views and give your own opinion 89
- The chart and table below give information about healthcare resources and life expectancy in different countries 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 351, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , whereas
...ical devices and pharmaceutical products,whereas subsidizing health promotion such as sp...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, so, therefore, whereas, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1707.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59672131148 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35678145332 2.80592935109 120% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609836065574 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 541.8 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 81.7282081047 49.4020404114 165% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.25 106.682146367 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 7.06120827912 123% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177510435951 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0548232039994 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.065091398276 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10127441131 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0593526224098 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.7 13.0946893788 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.5 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.78 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 78.4519038076 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.