It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct. There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening. Do you agree or disagree?
The protection of animal species has captured significant public attention in recent decades. Given the suggestion that there is no need for humans to prevent a natural process which is blamed for animal extinction, I totally disagree with this idea.
First, it is understandable why advocates may claim that animals becoming extinct is unavoidable due to a natural process. A given explanation is that the demise of dinosaurs is derived from a natural disaster which does not include human involvement. Also, tsunamis, forest fires, or volcanic eruptions could be the culprit of animal extinction. This thinking is valid to some extent; however, it is undeniable that human activities are also a contributor to animal extinction. Industrial activities have destroyed the natural habitat of animals, which makes them unable to find food and reproduce. Moreover, humans should be responsible for climate change by releasing an excessive amount of emissions into the atmosphere, leading to global warming. Therefore, the demise of thousands of species is dramatically decreasing because of unfavorable living conditions.
Second, the diversity of species plays an important role in human life. Animals should be protected for science activities and education as their distinctive genes could pave a way for medical breakthroughs. On top of that, the protection of wild animals is also synonymous with safeguarding the existence of mankind. For example, 95 % of forest fires were discovered and extinguished by rhinos which are a threatened species. Hence, if they decline in population, it could exert adverse impacts since fires are noticed only after they are widespread.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that the decrease in animal populations is a result of a natural process; nevertheless, mankind should still take responsibility for protecting them for human survival.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-02 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-25 | havanas | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | tranquockhanh | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | hien2422006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | jasmine.27 | 95 | view |
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 84
- The sales of gold in Dubai for 12 months in 2002 in millions of dirhams
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- Some people think that parents should teach their children how to be healthy and have a balanced diet Others however believe that school is the best place to learn this Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
- Proponents of animal testing say that it has enabled the development of many life saving treatments for both humans and animals that there is no alternative method for researching a complete living organism and that strict regulations prevent the mistreat 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, still, therefore, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1597.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.54513888889 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10045415036 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.618055555556 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.5954951527 49.4020404114 60% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.466666667 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.93333333333 7.06120827912 141% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28078033081 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0857280538043 0.084324248473 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0794353126991 0.0667982634062 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187410197936 0.151304729494 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639610834686 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.39 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.