It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct (e.g. Dinosaur, dodos …) There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening.
Do you agree or disagree?
Some people believe that there are no reasons for us to protect animal species from extinction as it is the result of evolution and it even occurs in the absence of human interference. In my opinion, I disagree with this view. The selfish human activities such as hunting, industrialization and pollution are responsible for this happening.
It is understandable that the extinction of some animal species was initially caused by natural changes. Millions of years ago, many ancient animals like dinosaurs were exterminated due to climate abnormality and rising sea levels. Since this process was brought about by the natural world, several people may believe it is better to let that natural process be untouched. Moreover, the potential danger when some animal species which are carnivorous and have a supersized body are revived to their prosperity could be incredibly harmful. Having these animals walking on the Earth’s surface could be a threat to the human being.
However, these environmental factors are not the primary contributor to the disappearance of animal species nowadays. Hunting and agricultural land lead to the disappearance of animals and the destruction of habitats which live thousands of creatures. Farmers cut down forests to have more places, planting crops and raising livestock, which later provide to human being. Besides, Industrial activities have devastated the natural habitats of wildlife. The increased demand for products made from animals’ skins and horns leads to the problems of endangered animals. Furthermore, man-made pollution contributes to the loss of species, too. Discharging sewage and other toxic substances into rivers have killed off fishes and other marine animals. Therefore, I believe human we should take responsibility to prevent the extinction of animal species.
In conclusion, even though the disappearance of many animal species occurs as a natural process, I believe that the principal factor is our doings like industrialization and pollution. As a result, it is our obligation to help preserve wild animals.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-25 | havanas | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-22 | tranquockhanh | 95 | view |
| 2023-07-29 | hien2422006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-06-24 | jasmine.27 | 95 | view |
| 2023-06-23 | roadtoapro | 89 | view |
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are common than small local shop Is this a negative or positive development 61
- Many university students live with their families while others live away from home because their universities are in different places Do you think the advantages of living with their families outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Research shows that business meetings discussions and training are happening online nowadays Do you think advantages outweigh disadvantages 78
- In some countries where the unemployment rate are high most students should be offered only primary education There is no point in offering secondary education to those who will have no hope of finding jobs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Today large shopping centers and supermarkets are common than small local shop Is this a negative or positive development 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt the extinction of animal species. In conclusion, even though the disappear...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, therefore, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 320.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.515625 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22948505376 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08618234788 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 37.4377260705 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0555555556 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.66666666667 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27607162518 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0770563911552 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0665619988801 0.0667982634062 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16433918655 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0537657351453 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.