It is now possible to perform everyday tasks, such as bank transaction, shopping or even office works, without meeting people face to face. What are the effects it may have on individuals and the society as a whole?
In today’s modern world, with the rapid development of digital technology, individuals could complete almost their daily tasks without direct interaction. While some people think that this tendency brings a numerous advantages, others claim that it has a detrimental impact on human life. My following essay will analyse both sides of this trend.
On the one hand, there are several reasons why a whole host of critics believe that online transactions make their life easier. It is not uncommon that these activities save their valuable time and energy. Users could purchase items, transform cash or even negotiate with international partners through a cyberspace without commuting to anywhere. A report from Queensland University showed that 80% Australians had ever made a purchase online through their technology gadget in 2017. The reasons given by online shoppers are they could compare the price or size among a various the branch and pay online without time-consuming. Therefore, it is clear that completing own daily tasks on the Internet has undeniable advantages.
On the other hand, this phenomenon also has a negative impact on individuals and community. With the widespread of Internet and E-commerce, the risk of the leakage personal information is highly increasing. This is because the first step to purchase online is inform their name, bank account, email address and the phone number. These tremendous data are a target for cybercriminals who have ability steal whole of your money without visit your residence. This is well illustrated by the evidence that Ms Huong who is Vietcombank’s client was stolen 500 million just by click strange website. Thus, the online transaction exposure has an adverse impact on human life.
In conclusion, the above analyses show that performing almost daily tasks through cyberspace have both pros and cons, however, I believe it is an inevitable trend in the future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-02-08 | phuongmeomeooo | 11 | view |
- Some people believe that the media such as the press TV and Internet should be more strictly controlled Others feel that controls should be loosened to give people freer access to information Discuss both views 64
- Nowadays, with the advancement of modern technology people can complete their various daily needs through the Internet and mobile phones without direct interaction with people. This phenomenon has both positive as well as negative impacts on individual an 67
- Discipline is an ever increasing problem in modern schools. Some people think that the discipline should be the responsibility of teachers, while others think that this is the role of parents.Discuss both sides and give your opinion. 73
- Studying at university is the best route to a successful career, while others belive that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both of views and give your opinion. 73
- People increasingly access the news online these days rather than buying newspaper and magazines to find out what is going on Some people predict that because of the spread of internet news the newspaper will disappear at some point in the future Do you a 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 222, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'advantage'?
Suggestion: advantage
...nk that this tendency brings a numerous advantages, others claim that it has a detrimental...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 261, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'informed'.
Suggestion: informed
...se the first step to purchase online is inform their name, bank account, email address...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 24.0651302605 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39144736842 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89551238116 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628289473684 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 513.0 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.6108540497 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.4375 106.682146367 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0767037348444 0.244688304435 31% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.022267773419 0.084324248473 26% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0229120741715 0.0667982634062 34% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0466568978694 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00544027509378 0.056905535591 10% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.98 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.05 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.