It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study
science subject. What are causes? And what will be effects on society?
In several parts of the world, there is currently a lack of students choosing to study
science in universities and colleges. This problem happens due to some reasons, and it
can have some adverse impacts on society.
There are several reasons why fewer university students are choosing science as their
major. Firstly, these subjects are usually more difficult and demanding, which requires
students to put much effort into their study. For example, my friend who is doing a
course in Biology said that he had to conduct too many experiments and complete
numerous projects, which prevented him from having any free time. As a result, science
subjects seem to be less attractive to students compared to economics or businessrelated
subjects. Secondly, as there are currently fewer employment opportunities
available for graduates in science fields, learners are less likely to decide to select these
majors. Instead, they tend to choose other subjects which allow them to find jobs more
easily.
A shortage of learners in science fields can result in some negative effects. The first
impact is that when fewer students decide to learn about science, there would be a
serious shortage of employees working in these fields. This would lead to fewer
technological developments, which would also prevent improvements in people's life
quality. For instance, it would be difficult for humans to produce newer smart phones
with better functions. Additionally, while a significantly increasing number of students
are choosing economics and business to study, the number of job vacancies in these
areas is limited. Therefore, many university graduates would have to face
unemployment, which increases burden on society.
In conclusion, the shortage of students choosing science subjects is caused by several
factors, and this problem might bring about serious impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-04-25 | IVANTRUONG | 67 | view |
- Holiday accommodation chosen by the British in 2010 91
- the graph below shows the quantities of goods transported in the UK between 1974 and 2002 by four different modes of transport. 73
- the diagram below shows how coffee is produced and prepared for sale in supermarkets and shops 84
- Often, the most successful people--in business, athletics, entertainment, or any field--are those who have focused all of their attention on achieving a specific goal. Those who spread their energy in many directions may not be as successful. In your opin 70
- the global sales of 5 mobile phone brands 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1611.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 290.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.55517241379 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12666770723 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8158397729 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 176.041082164 95% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579310344828 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 484.2 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.9791598806 49.4020404114 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.4 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3333333333 20.7667163134 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.93333333333 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 23.0 4.38176352705 525% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143077934521 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0519029218422 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0424208286649 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0424585872822 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0529690971194 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.