Irrefutably, the ultimate goal of modern authority is to ensure a rapid progress of every realm. It is believed by some that government invest excessively to preserve wildlife. Due to which, other vital projects are ignored by government. I, however, accord with the provided notion at large extent as it holds a valid ground.
There are umpteen reasons why spending on other projects is important in spite of focusing more on animal kingdom. First and foremost, undeniably, government should spends money not only on infrastructure of towns but aslo on space projects. To demonstrate it, the lives of humans is in danger zone while staying on earth planet. For example, food and natural resources are consuming at an alarming rate, which ultimately causes imbalance of lifes on earth in future. Hence, there is a great need to find new earth forms. Besides this, basically, people living in cites are in demand of accommodation to live. To elaborate it, some destitute people may not find place to live especially in cities. As a result, government established new apartments, where people can enjoy splendid facilities.
Further emphasing on my viewpoints. To embark with, new stadiums, parks, and roads should be designed for overall development of local people. To cite an example, people are suffering from health related ailments because they have few outdoor places to perform physical activity such as running and yoga. What is more, travelers have to encounter traffic congestion. To elaborate it, owing to more james, their travelling takes more minutes than expected. Consequently, government need to wide the roads in order to increase the flow of traffics.
To recapitulate, as per my above discussion, it is apparent that although, animal species aslo have right to live additional years, hunam survival is supposed to be first priority and can never be ignored.
- It is often said that governments spend too much money on projects to protect wildlife while there are other problems that are more important Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that travelling within a city is better by car while some other think bicycle is a better means Discuss both sides and give your opinion 84
- The map below shows the development of the village of Ryemouth between 1995 and present 78
- The bar graph below shows the numbers of male and female research students studying six computer science subjects at a US university in 2011 95
- Some Think That It Is More Important For Children To Engage In Outdoor Activities Instead Of Playing Video Games 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 65, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'rapid progress'.
Suggestion: rapid progress
...e goal of modern authority is to ensure a rapid progress of every realm. It is believed by some ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 166, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'should' requires the base form of the verb: 'spend'
Suggestion: spend
...foremost, undeniably, government should spends money not only on infrastructure of tow...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 458, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...tely causes imbalance of lifes on earth in future. Hence, there is a great need to find n...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, consequently, first, hence, however, if, may, so, while, for example, such as, as a result, in spite of, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1583.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 303.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22442244224 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17215713816 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83055590816 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.653465346535 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.2474086172 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 83.3157894737 106.682146367 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9473684211 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.89473684211 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.122529619299 0.244688304435 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0358327120121 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515192051319 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.059678090929 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427186596686 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.64 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.