It seems clear that obesity in today’s society is to some extent due to the
availability of fast food. Should governments place a tax on fast food to reduce
the amount of fast food consumed?
Fastfood availability has made overweight a common problem in today's modern world. In order to reduce the consumption of fast food, some people argue that the government should impose the tax. I completely agree with this and will further discuss the need for tax imposal.
To begin with, fast food causes a lot of health problems due to various reasons. Firstly, it contains huge amount of sugars, lipids and oil, which eventually leads to obesity and cardiac diseases. Moreover, these days, parents due to their hectic schedule are making their kids eat this junk food. This will, in tur, lead to health issues at a very young age in the children. However, this problem can be solved by implementing certain measures.
Although fast foods are harmful to our health, certain precautions can be taken. Firstly, the government should impose heavy taxes on the sellers and in addition, healthy food should be made available to the people in the place of this junk food. It should provide emphasis on the restaurants that serve healthy diet. People should also be made aware of the consequences they face by consuming unhealthy food, by media campaigning. Furthermore, parents should educate their children on the ill effects of eating those oily foods and also should spare some of their time in cooking for their children, despite their busy life.
To summarize, the government need to impose heavy taxes on the people selling junk food and also should emphasize the people on the harmful effects of cosuming junk food.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-09-17 | Sai sushma | 61 | view |
- the diagram below shows a neighbourhood before and after a mall was constructed 64
- Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 16
- Favourite school subject for boys in school 56
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 56
- The bar chart shows the divorce rates in two European countries from 2011 to 2015.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, in addition, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06324110672 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47516054474 2.80592935109 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 377.1 506.74238477 74% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1525014188 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.5 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0714285714 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.339482564391 0.244688304435 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117241038685 0.084324248473 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102044434881 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211721613461 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0460431313828 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 13.0946893788 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.77 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.