It is suggested that all the young adults undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community. Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people?
Many people argue that youngsters should help community without getting paid. This essay will explain the advantages and disadvantages and provides a logical conclusion.
To start with, it is admitted that young people have less experience due to their age. Because of this, participating in community program would possibly help them to gain a lot of experiences. This means that they would be prepared for real job since many experiences they have been through. By this, it can be said that young people would get used to dealing with many problems if they had participated in many social events. In addition, the community would receive a lot of benefit since it is totally free so that they could save their money for other needs. Because of this, community’s expenses would possibly enhance their infrastructures.
In contrast, it can be said that unpaid community service doing by teenagers would possibly emerge negative impacts. Firstly, since it is free job, the young adults can not collect money for their future. It means that youngsters could not fulfill their own needs due to free work. By this, it will lead them to frugal life since they do not posses any saving. Secondly, it can be admitted that young adults need to focus on their carrier plan related to their future job. It means that teenagers will mostly spend their in to help community. If they did not have much time to concentrate to their future profession, they would struggle later.
In conclusion, it can be said that unpaid work in community could harm the teenager because they do not have much time to collect money and prepare their future plan. Nevertheless, I assume that the benefits outweigh the drawbacks since they can obtain lots of experiences and community could save their expenses.
- Scientists predict that in the future cars will be driven by computers What are reasons behind this Is it positive or negative development 73
- In many countries more and more people buy a wider range of household goods like a TV set microwave oven Do you think this is a positive or negative development 73
- The pie charts below show the result of a survey of children s activities The first chart shows the cultural and leisure activities that boys participate in whereas the second chart shows the activities in which the girls participate 67
- A person s worth nowadays seems to be judged according to social status and material possession Old fashioned values such as honour kindness and trust no longer seem important To what extent you do agree or disagree with this opinion 73
- It is suggested that all the young adults undertake a period of unpaid work helping people in the community Does it bring more benefits or drawbacks to the community and the young people 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 24.0651302605 208% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1485.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.96655518395 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59478755403 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.488294314381 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 444.6 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 26.8679971966 49.4020404114 54% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 87.3529411765 106.682146367 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5882352941 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.47058823529 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.187405950412 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0717504703307 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0524353644555 0.0667982634062 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13042302906 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159116824168 0.056905535591 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.0946893788 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.25 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.81 8.58950901804 91% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 78.4519038076 80% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.