It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages?
It is an ever-increasing debate whether the drawbacks of possessing a car, a television and a fridge outweigh its benefits regarding the social development. While some individuals are in favour of this opinion, I am personally of the opposite side due to some following arguments.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that these everyday-used goods namely a car, a television and a fridge is detrimental for our community. Firstly, they will leave a serious impact on human health. Being in front of the television or behind the wheel for a long time results in sedentary habits which consequently triggers some digestive disorders. Using fridge to store foods prompts unhealthy eating habits, particularly when people have a tendency to snack on some fattening treats available on their fridge. Secondly, these goods will have adverse impact on the environment since necessitating cars and fridges can generate greenhouse emissions. Besides, the dispose of these products may be harmful to the natural habitats.
On the other hand, I would contend that having possession of a car, a television and a fridge is exceedingly beneficial. Car travelling is an innovation of modern society as it reduces commuting time, which consequently frees people of utilizing their time to devote to their works or their family. A television enables people to access to the development of the global economy and society up to the minute. Bonus, undoubtedly a delectable and healthy meal cannot be done unless there is a modern fridge. Additionally, today with the fast-paced growth of technology, the environment issues relating to the dispose of high-tech products will be tackled effectively.
In conclusion, it seems to me that the benefits of having possession a car, a television and a fridge is much more pivotal than its drawbacks.
- Recently we are facing increasing number of cars which poses a great threat to the pedestrians and cyclists What s more a lot of parks need to be sacrificed as a result of the construction of railways and superhighways Do you agree or disagree What do you 67
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages? 84
- Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- It is suggested that everyone wants to have a car, a television and a fridge. Do the disadvantages of this development for society outweigh the advantages? 61
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?What sort of punishment parents and teache 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 660, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...generate greenhouse emissions. Besides, the dispose of these products may be harmful to the...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 603, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...ogy, the environment issues relating to the dispose of high-tech products will be tackled e...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, first, firstly, may, regarding, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 293.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25255972696 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11865098964 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.569965870307 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8043053421 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9285714286 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.28571428571 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208172496606 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0666995573314 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0473478129738 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120468683174 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0153157927224 0.056905535591 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.