Flora and fauna are the paramount importance of human life. People should come to realize their vital role and become aware of developing and defending them. Opinions diverge on whether kids had better figure out how to grow vegetables and protect animals. Although there seem some drawbacks existed, merits override owing to some rational reasons.
Admittedly, It is perceptible that children are the wonderful targets for people to educate about this mission at the beginning. The first reason is that some children have little knowledge about the world of plants and animal’s world, as well as the process of producing the vegetables or meats that they eat. Therefore, teaching them in primary schools can help them broaden their horizon about the flora and fauna and make them feel respectful and grateful to the hard-working farmers. Moreover, vegetables are likely to be scarce by the COVID time. Evidently, when children get the information about the way of growing plants, they can apply it in real life and have their own vegetables to consume without worrying about the quality of them.
Further and more prominently, sadly speaking, more and more animals are facing extinction these days due to people’s unawareness. Government can reduce this unexpected rate by adding the knowledge of preserving animals into the primary studying period. Children can internalize it and practice to protect fauna in their life. For example, when teachers tell their students about the value of animals, the students can get that knowledge and they commence to show their love and treat the animals well instead of rudely abandoning them.
In conclusion, teaching primary children about growing plants and keeping animals brings myriad merits to people.
- Traditional education versus online education which one is better 89
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 150 words 61
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of different age groups in a European country on different TV programmes in 2012 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- Some people think watching TV is bad for children while others think that watching TV has more beneficial effects on children Discuss both views and give your own opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 286, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice protecting'.
Suggestion: practice protecting
...period. Children can internalize it and practice to protect fauna in their life. For example, when ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29390681004 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56757942927 2.80592935109 92% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573476702509 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 457.2 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.5169142817 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.5 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9285714286 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.71428571429 7.06120827912 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182960141554 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0642883140468 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05479254043 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12681109127 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0516433332701 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.